The WA government has strongly denied traditional owners' claims they are being forced off a camp ground near a proposed gas precinct.
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/radio/episode/194487/WA-government-denies-protestors-asked-to-leave-camp
THAT IS NOT WHAT THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE DEVELOPMENT SAID TO THE ABC ON TUESDAY
Protesters at possible danger from cyclones - ABC Kimberley WA - Australian Broadcasting Corporation
The Department of State Development is overseeing the gas hub project and it's deputy director general, Gail McGowan, has confirmed the camps are illegal.
"Certainly, establishing permanent facilities is clearly prohibited under the legislation," she said. For the first time the Government is considering forcing the campers out. Ms McGowan says the next steps are being considered.
"The relevant government agencies are working together on the issue, certainly with a mind to the cyclone season approaching, and also considering the impact on other resources, and looking at whether any addition action is needed," she said.
Redhand received information earlier this week that several government agencies met in Perth a couple of weeks ago and the main item on their agenda was how they were going to deal with the protestors embedded in Country, at James Price Point.
Well, if these government public servants are actually paid to think and come up with solid strategies as to how to address the very annoying issue of these protectors than Redhand would like to suggest that if their premise is cyclones and concern for people’s well - being than maybe having a cyclone in the vicinity at the time would be far more convincing that their intentions were virtuous.
People can see exactly what the game is, give us a break.!
But the question remains begging, why are they considering building the world’s second largest gas refineries in a cyclonic location? Does anyone remember that last year in November 2010, Woodside Petroleum had to rebuild several flare towers used to burn off waste gas because they did not meet design requirements to withstand expected wind speeds.
The costs for its Pluto liquefied natural gas (LNG) project blew out by $900 million and took another six months to begin production while it rebuilt equipment that fell short of design specifications.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/business/woodside-delays-start-of-pluto-as-costs-soar-20101130-18efm.html#ixzz1fN2XrIEc
This is nothing more than a thinly disguised excuse to clear the watchers and protectors out of country. The authorities don't seem the least bit concerned about the small communities and outcamps up and down the west coast of the Peninsular. Funny that, isn't it.
ReplyDelete