Sunday, May 23, 2010

Red Hand Goes International

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is emerging as a World Best Practice approach for addressing the social and environmental impact of company activities. Companies from the oil and gas sector are very reluctant to implement and our State government refuses even to want to speak about it. The Broome Community is the only one who can really grant the social licence to operate. Woodside and the State government have to prove to us, as a community that they can operate with responsibility and integrity, so far they are failing miserably.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Gulf Air "Unsafe"

From: greenopolis.com:

Rikki Ott, marine toxicologist and Exxon Valdez survivor, talks to GreenopolisTV about the effects of air pollution due to oil spills. Rikki says based on air monitoring conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in a Louisiana coastal community, findings show that airborne levels of toxic chemicals like hydrogen sulfide, and volatile organic compounds, now far exceed safety standards for human exposure currently in those areas.


The first oil from the Gulf of Mexico spill has entered an ocean current that could take it to Florida and up the east coast of the US, scientists say. European scientists warn the spill could reach Florida within six days.

Oil has been spewing into the Gulf since the offshore drilling rig Deepwater Horizon, leased by oil giant BP, exploded off the coast of Louisiana on 20 April and sank two days later.

Satellite images released by the European Space Agency (ESA) depict a streak of oil stretching south from the main slick into the Loop Current - a body of fast-flowing water coming from the Caribbean which the agency says is likely to propel oil towards Florida within six days.

Meanwhile, astronauts and cosmonauts aboard the International Space Station have said they could see the oil spill while passing over the Gulf of Mexico.

"It looks very scary," Russian cosmonaut Oleg Kotov told reporters via a video link.

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Kimberley Land Council WAKE UP

Whilst, redhand is in Africa, thought it would be a good idea to show the supporters of the proposed oil & gas at James Price Point, what their indigenous brothers & sisters are suffering under the very same companies that Kimberley Land Council wish to do deals with. They all have full time employment, its called survival.

Saturday, May 8, 2010

Broome Community No Gas Rally


http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/breaking/7193895/400-protest-against-broome-gas-project/

Hundreds gathered at Chinatown Oval in Broome this morning for a peaceful and warm hearted rally to express their support for retaining the Kimberley coast without industrial development, specifically a LNG at James Price Point.
It was a spectacle of banners, placards, floating fish, paddling turtles and a waving whale, music and people.
Inspiring performances by Kerrianne Cox, Steve Pigram, Harry Jackamarra, Clint and Wil Thomas; The speakers Joseph Roe, Lorna Cox, Neil McKenzie, Martin Pritchard, Arnhem Hunter, Robyn Wells, Kerry Marvell and Chris Maher urged us to stay strong; to write to the Prime Minister; make this an election issue; beware the social consequences; understand what’s happened in the Pilbara; a wise warning about the drug issues ‘without speed the Burrup would never have been built’; to be informed; to ask questions; understand what real Indigenous employment means; keep looking after country. The message was loud and clear, no one here wants gas in the Kimberley.
“Thanks everyone
Good onya
Keep the faith
Spread the word
Stay strong for country”

Friday, May 7, 2010

WWF - As US oil spill worsens, Australia delays report

WWF - As US oil spill worsens, Australia delays report

Sunrise decision 'fails legal test'

LINDSAY MURDOCH
May 7, 2010

THE regulator of East Timor's petroleum industry has accused Woodside of failing to comply with its legal obligations before announcing plans to build a floating liquefied natural gas platform above the Timor Sea's Greater Sunrise field.

In a confidential letter seen by BusinessDay, the independent National Petroleum Authority criticised Woodside for failing to provide regulators with detailed reports and its findings on all three possible development plans for the field before deciding on the floating platform.

East Timor's leaders have repeatedly demanded the gas be piped to a processing plant in East Timor and say they will not approve either a floating platform or piping the gas to Darwin, which the Woodside-led consortium also considered.

As accusations swirl around the multibillion-dollar joint venture, East Timor's Prime Minister, Xanana Gusmao, refused to meet Woodside chief executive Don Voelte in Dili yesterday, saying he would not compromise the "integrity" of "negotiation mechanisms".

A group of about 200 protesters prevented Mr Voelte (pictured right) and representatives of the other joint-venture partners from leaving Dili's VIP airport lounge for almost two hours yesterday.

After the tense standoff, the group was eventually allowed to leave for a meeting with East Timor's President, Jose Ramos Horta, who has asked for briefings on the project.

"We wanted Mr Voelte and his party to know that Timorese demand the gas be piped to East Timor to promote our economic growth and jobs," said Vincente Mauboci, the group's spokesman.

In a confidential letter dated May 4, Mr Gusmao told Mr Voelte he was "surprised" by the company's announcement about a floating platform and said he was convinced "there must have been a wrongful interpretation" of the Greater Sunrise agreement.

Comments by Mr Gusmao and other East Timorese political leaders about Greater Sunrise have fuelled nationalist sentiment in the nation of 1 million people.

Some influential Timorese believe that development of the field should be delayed and say the government in Dili should not be afraid of walking away from the deal in which East Timor and Australia would equally share $US40 billion ($A44 billion) in revenue.

East Timor is debt free and has almost $US6 billion of oil and gas revenue invested in the US, which is increasing by $US100 million a month.

But local institutions lack the capacity to provide the services and infrastructure needed to lift the majority of Timorese from poverty.

In his letter to Mr Voelte, Mr Gusmao, a former guerilla commander and revolutionary hero, challenged Woodside's pledge that building a floating platform would boost Timorese employment and training skills.

"As far as we know, from 2002 until now, there have only been seven Timorese officers working as trainees in ConocoPhillips," Mr Gusmao said, referring to Woodside's consortium partner.

"This suggests to us that the best we can look forward to under your concept is having another seven Timorese working with you.''

Gulf Oil Spill - Where's The Latest Imagery?


For the most reliable up todate information about the Gulf Oil Spill follow

http://blog.skytruth.org/2010/05/gulf-oil-spill-wheres-latest-imagery.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed& utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Skytruth+%28SkyTruth%29.
both on their site and on tweeter.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

We beg your patience. Our main source of imagery is from the NASA satellites, Terra and Aqua, that carry the MODIS sensor. This sensor measures visible to infrared wavelengths of light, so when it's cloudy or hazy in the Gulf, we get a nice picture of...clouds and haze. MODIS images also show a distinct pattern of glittery sunglint on the water (when there are no clouds in the way, and the geometry with the sun is just right). This can be very useful for mapping oil slicks because the oil flattens out the water, and will appear either very dark or very bright (depending, again, on the sun angle). But other things can make the water flat: calm winds, for example. So if we get a MODIS image that suffers from too many of these quality problems, we don't process and post it because it's not providing useful information about the spill.

See our Twitter feed (just glance to your right!) - that's where we post updates and info that's briefer and more timely than these blog entries. Follow us on Twitter and when we know it, you'll know it.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Gas hub claims process heats up

Gas hub claims process heats up

New oil lease 83kms offshore from Margaret River,


http://www.margaretrivermail.com.au/news/local/news/general/rally-over-oil-threat/1821472.aspx

SURFERS and conservationists are leading the fight to get the South West marine environment protected from possible offshore oil development.

The Surfrider Foundation and Conservation Council of WA have joined forces to organise a community rally this Saturday at noon at Reuther Park.

It comes in response to plans for a new oil lease 83kms offshore from Margaret River, in an area designated for assessment for future marine sanctuaries.The Greens have demanded the Western Australian Government give the south-west marine environment priority over oil development in the region.

An area of ocean, off the coast of Margaret River, was short-listed in the 2010 Offshore Petroleum Acreage Releases.

The area has also been earmarked as a potential marine sanctuary.

The Conservation Council has called on the Government to postpone a decision about the oil lease until a marine assessment is completed.

Greens' Senator Rachael Siewert says protecting marine life should be the Government's primary concern.

"We know this area has some very unique environmental features, we know it's important for whales," she said.

"Given that this area is being considered for marine protection, we believe that process needs to proceed before any decisions are made about oil and gas exploration."

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Outcry after oil spill

For the Gulf #oilspill: Today's MODIS satellite image - fresh oil upwelling, slick footprint up to 3260 sq. miles - http://tinyurl.com/2dzkv...
and additional news at
http://www.examiner.com/x-4002-Green-Living-Examiner

Indigenous group to lodge new James Price Pt claim

Indigenous group to lodge new James Price Pt claim

Scientists oppose Broome gas hub

Scientists oppose Broome gas hub

NASA Satellite Images Show Gulf Oil Spill Size Larger Than Florida




Social networking may turn out to be the first line of defense against public relations spin by providing real time gathering of data on the massive river of oil flowing into the Gulf of Mexico from the Transocean/Deepwater Horizon well explosion. Maps generated by satellite and "predictions" are only so valuable. One of the tenets of remote sensing is that "ground truthing" be a mandatory part of the equation. Truth is the operative word here as Gulf Coast residents face an unprecedented environmental disaster.

It’s been a bit of a revelation for Redhand about the extent in which the flow of information is so controlled and this has clearly been illustrated by the way in which the Mexican Gulf Oil Spill information flow has in lots of ways dried up. There are no new videos, or images for the last three days and those that are up there are very difficult to upload or do not connect at all. The ones that are getting through are either company or government issued or driven. This major news item seems to have dropped out of the major media outlets view.

It’s not just Redhand, many people all over the world are currently complaining about the lack of information flow and the validity of the trickle that is getting through about this spill. Even twitter has slowed to a tweet, every now and again. Research on this issue confirms that the free flow of information on the internet is manipulated and controlled over the years by corporations and governments and they are getting far more efficient at it. Printing press, radio, and television all started with free flow, but then became one way medias, in the hands of a few.

We can not allow ourselves to be thrown off track by these distracters who have hijacked our debates. These information hijackers are terrorists--I call them, information terrorists that are taking the reigns of our media, spreading their propaganda, refusing people’s access to real life truth, demeaning our freedom of speech and limiting our abilities to respond to issues in an informed way?

Redhand has experienced this first hand with the complete cover up of the Broome Dinosaur trackways blog and the Australian National Heritage Commission’s complete denial of the world significance of this 200 kms site. Only the local media picked up this story and it really went nowhere. Normally, stories of this nature would attract international and national coverage.

It does not matter if it is ordinary citizens who are inputting real-time photos and testimony in order for the general public to have the opportunity to experience first hand what is really happening in the Gulf of Mexico and along its shores, if their flows of information have been cut and they are locked out.

Following is a comment on another blog
Alexander Higgins says:
May 4, 2010 at 12:43 am

Seriously…. Where is all of the silt in the prior satellite photos? There are loads of them on this site and that “silt” only seems to surround the spill.
For example, http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/subsets/?subset=AERONET_WaveCIS_Site_CSI_6.2010115.terra.1km is the satellite image from 4/26… no “silt”.
Prior to the incident, 4/16 http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/subsets/?subset=AERONET_WaveCIS_Site_CSI_6.2010106.terra.1km and again no “silt”.
Also: updated article and added the ABC map, which is very close to what I have outlined with the exception that the ABC map does not go as far south.
And what the news is reporting is closer to what BP/Big Brother is telling them which has been proven to be a lie several times in this debacle. Even CNN’s latest map shows the spill decreased in size since yesterday, which happens to coincide with a FALSE BP report that they were successful in a partial sealing of the rig.
CNN Data shows oil spill on May 2, which is much larger than what they show for May 3rd.
But here is CNN’s graph for May 3rd. How did this happen? BP mistakenly released a false statement they were successful in partially sealing off the well. Just coincidence?
Regardless, the graph does not match ABC’s. Further most organizations are reporting data that is days old and even that is from Government sources. SkyTruth has already called out government sources twice. Remember when it was only 1,000 barrels a day? If it wasn’t for SkyTruth, CNN and every other media outlet would be reporting much lower figures.
Listen to the news, heh? CNN or ABC or who?? Or just look at the satellite images and see for myself. Hum?
http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2010/05/04/today-in-questionable-sourcing-ny-times-misfires-on-oil-spill-assessment.aspx

NASA Satellite Images Show Gulf Oil Spill Size Larger Than Florida

Saturday, May 1, 2010

SLAM DUNK


If Woodside Petroleum chief Don Voelte had had any personal or professional experience or consequence with the Exxon Valdez (Prince William Sound) spill or the Montara blowout or the current catastrophe playing itself in the Gulf Coast, he could never be so ignorant in his arrogance.

It really would not take that much to blow the wind out of Mr Voelte’s sales: an unseasonable weather event, a tanker explosion, a leaking pipe or hundreds of his company’s workers all starting to drop dead because they are being exposed to such high levels of unmonitored and unacceptable levels of toxic emissions. There are thousands of possible variables that would really put all the meanings of slam (bang crash smash thump), into Mr Voltel's expression Slam Dunk.7

There are major concerns for all the people and their communities living along the Gulf Coast because even after 20 years, the Prince William Sound is still experiencing subsurface oil all over their environment, not to mention trying to manage the social, economic and community health impacts that still haunts. Even after their seventeen years of a hard fought court battle, these local residents (plaintiffs) received 5 cents to the dollar that was awarded by a jury.

Are those working on the Gulf spill aware that this stuff is very toxic to human health? Redhanded wouldn’t be surprised if most of the people standing up to assist in the clean up operations underway in the Gulf Coast (impossible task) are not trained and will not be wearing or provided with respirators. Unfortunately, this health effects toll will guarantee ongoing rotations of lots of high paying jobs.

The facts are that as long as we: tie ourselves to fossil fuels, trust multinationals with their fallible technologies and weak counterbalance responses, or rely on lead by their nose feeble governments, we will continue to have these total economic, social and environmental tragedies.

We need to manage our responsibilities with solid visionary leadership based on the principles for the real overall well-being of the planet and for the real benefit of all occupants of this planet and not for the profit of a few, who are addicted to the selfish greed conscious that is founded on the theory at any cost.

Bits of signed paper does nothing to stop oil spills or gas blowouts and it does not matter what type of strategic preparedness you have in place or the mitigating management plans nothing can beat the first cold light of reality.

The Oil and Gas industries are very toxic both to the environment and the people that live in that shared environment. It does not matter whether it’s a tanker spill, a gas blow out, a platform spill, or the everyday oil leak from one of the millions of vehicles people drive that finds its way into the ocean and or the groundwater aquifer system that we are totally reliant on.

All the major multinational companies are interlinked and internet-connected for controlled propaganda purposes, and for the overall manipulating of the masses with their chosen selected half truths. Whether its oil or gas, media or even war marauding, they all sit on each other Boards of Management and share their shares. Multinationals companies, their shareholders and all their workers are all pushing for energy development with fossil fuels and in all truth are all it in for the money.

Redhanded is very sorry for the people who have lost their loved ones, those who have lost their special places that they truly loved, that sustained them, their communities, and all the hopes they held for their children's futures.

We will challenge the Don Voletes of the world, their old fashion and highly limited mentality, their inadequate and totally inappropriate visions of complete depletion of our planet and its precious resources, for the sake of the greedy. The price is too high and James will not be paying.
“slam dunk”

Friday, April 23, 2010

How long is a piece of string, how big is the hole in the bucket



PROPOSED BROWSE LNG PRECINCT, Walmadan (James Price Point)


All is quiet on the western front and the silence is almost deafening as some major spanners play their imperative and indispensable role in slowing down the whole process for the proposed development of a LNG precinct at Walmadan (James Price Point).

All the humbug happening with regards to all the Native Title business has in all reality stopped the final formulation and content of the Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA). The ILUA has to provide the formal legal consent required under the Native Title Act 1993 for the valid establishment of the proposed LNG precinct at Walmadan (James Price Point) and the valid grant of the titles by the state to project proponents.

How valid then is both the Heads of Agreement and the Heritage Protection Agreement signed by the State, Woodside and the KLC (Kimberley Land Council)?

Meanwhile, in the Legislative Council on Tuesday the 20th of this week the Hon Robin Chapple asked several questions to the Minister for Mines and Petroleum, Hon Norman Moore about the proposed LNG Precinct at James Price Point. Department of State Development
(File Notation Area 8589).

Robin Chapple
Q 1. What is the total area (land and sea) covered by area 8589 ‘Proposed LNG Precinct’?

Norman Moore
A 1. 466.91 square kilometers, which is 46,691 hectares.

Robin Chapple
Q 2. Is the land area covered by area 8589 ‘Proposed LNG Precinct’ approximately 258.2 square kilometres?

Hon Norman Moore
A 2. The land area covered by File Notation Area 8589 is 262.8147 square kilometers which is 26,281 hectares

This is a lot more area than the Premier Colin Barnett has led the public to believe. Barnett stated on the Oct. 15 2008 “the precinct would be built on about 1,000 hectares, which he said was a small amount of land “in an area twice the size of Victoria state.”

on Dec 19 2008 “a 10km strip of land at James Price Point offered a range of potential development”.


on the Dec, 23rd 2008 "a balance of factors, had led to the choice of James Price for the 1,000 to 2,000 hectare industrial estate.”

And on the Wed 15 April, “The precinct at James Price Point would occupy about 1,000 hectares. With accommodation, ancillary services and an appropriate land and sea buffer, the total area may be up to 3,500 hectares.”

On the 12 April, 2010
The Hon Martin Ferguson, Minister for Resources and Energy Minister for Tourism stated “James Price Point represents about 2000 hectares of the Kimberley. That is, in essence, 0.0005 per cent of the Kimberley land mass and if a gas hub actually goes ahead it'll have to meet all the appropriate environmental considerations required by the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act”.

According to the Kimberley Social Impact Assessment Vol 1.
Scope and Profile July 2009
, page 25
the precinct will be around 2000-2500 hectares of land and approximately 1000 hectares of sea will be required for port facilities. It is anticipated that each operator would occupy 500 hectares including key infrastructure separation buffers. Precinct land area will also include infrastructure corridors, laydown areas and possible heritage protection land areas totaling 500 to 1500 hectares.

On the Department of State development website
states: The total land area of the precinct, will be about 2,000 to 2,500 hectares - just 0.2 per cent of the 1,400,000 hectare Dampier Peninsula.

In the Browse LNG Public Information Booklet
states on page 8
The Precinct will comprise areas of exclusive and non-exclusive access.
The exclusion zone is proposed to contain:
an industrial precinct (fenced) being:
two industrial blocks with each block exclusively accommodating stand-alone facilities for the relevant proponent allocated to the block (total of approximately 1,000ha); and common user area (service corridors, lay down areas and internal buffer areas,
being a total of approximately 500 - 1,000ha); and
land (fenced) and waters of the port (area to be determined but likely to be approximately 1,000ha).
The non-exclusion zone (unfenced) is proposed to contain:
workers. accommodation (up to 200ha);
light industrial area (up to 200ha);
access roads; and a buffer zone around the exclusion zone (approximately 3,000ha).


Tourism Impact Assessment – Kimberley Liquefied Natural Gas Project 2009, page 21 states: The James Price Point area about 60km north of Broome covers about 25,000 hectares or 250 km2, itself only a small part of the 13,000 sq km Dampier Peninsula.

According to Kimberley Land Council’s Aboriginal Social Impact Assessment Fact Sheet # 1. the following areas would be set aside for the gas precinct:

• Processing plants: 1000 hectares
• Infrastructure and facilities 500 – 1000 hectares
• Land and water for port 1000 hectares
• Workers accommodation, light industrial area etc: 200 – 500 hectares.

This gives a total area of between 2700 – 3500 hectares, which would be fenced and another 3000 hectares for the Buffer Zone.


Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct (BLNG) (notice the name change) – Infrastructure Assessment Study,
8th Feb 2010, page 6 under the Heading The BLNG Precinct Location states the BLNG precinct will cover an area between Coloumb Point and Quondong Beach, south of James Price Point. There is no mention of the size of the area within this document.

So it seems that no one knows precisely how big this precinct will be? And more importantly no one has any idea precisely where the Precinct will be located, so how can people make informed decisions?

And whilst on the subject, where is the Department of State Development’s BLNG document Project Description including Emissions, Discharges and Waste, released on Jan 2010 and why isn’t this document available on the DSD website?

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Expression of Concern at Proposal to Construct Gas-Processing Hub at James Price Point, on the coast of the Dampier Peninsula, in the Kimberley Region

17-25 September 2009
This document expresses concern at the recently-announced proposal to exploit natural petroleum gas resources of the Browse Basin by installing a pipe-line and gas-processing hub on the coast of the Dampier Peninsula, Western Australia.




This expression of concern is directed to the State Government of Western Australia, the Federal Government of Australia, and all or any of their corporate industrial partners who may be engaged in exploiting mineral resources of the Browse Basin.

Signatories to this document are professional scientists with special research interests in geological and biological evidence relating to the discipline of Vertebrate Palaeontology (the study of extinct vertebrate animals) and, more specifically, in terrestrial ecosystems of the Mesozoic Era (the 'Age of Dinosaurs'). These shared concerns are expressions of personal opinion and should not be interpreted as the views of any particular organizations or professional bodies.


Recently the State Government of Western Australia announced a well-advanced proposal to exploit natural gas resources of the Browse Basin by installing a pipe-line and gas-processing plant in the region of James Price Point, on the western coast of the Dampier Peninsula. The announcement provoked widespread and serious concern because Dampier Land is the western part of the Kimberley region, recognized internationally as one of the last five great wilderness areas remaining on this planet.* The first geological survey of the Dampier region was undertaken as recently as 1947, and much of the Kimberley remains unexplored to this day. Recent ecological investigations (2007-09) reported "amazing" diversity of animals and "countless" new and hitherto unknown species of plants.* In addition the Kimberley coastline was described as "spectacular and fragile". It seems singularly inappropriate to site major industrial developments in such a pristine environment, especially as its natural resources still await scientific investigation.

The proposal for a gas-processing hub mentioned merely that there were reports of dinosaur tracks in the area. In fact, the Dampier coast has provided practically the entire fossil record of dinosaurs in the western half of the Australian continent (the exceptions being a few small fragments of bone). Coastal exposures of the Broome Sandstone between Broome and Cape Leveque yield unique and richly informative insights into terrestrial ecosystems of Early Cretaceous age (approximately 132 million years old) and have been the focus of ongoing scientific research since 1991. The ancient Cretaceous landscapes were buried intact, and today those fossil landscapes are being exhumed by coastal erosion, revealing the original topography, with soils, leaf-litter and plants such cycads and ferns still in their original position of growth. The sites also contain evidence of invertebrate animals and crocodiles, but the most impressive fossils are the tracks of dinosaurs, some of them in densely-packed profusion. There are at least 15 different types of dinosaur tracks, representing every major group of the Dinosauria.† Some types are extremely rare, even unique; others represent dinosaurs that ranked among the largest yet known to science. Today one may walk across those ancient landscapes, following the tracks of dinosaurs as they meandered between the clumps of vegetation more than 130 million years ago. Few sites on Earth afford such opportunities to explore ancient terrestrial ecosystems in such complete and undisturbed condition.

The dino-saurian track-sites of the Dampier coast are rare and precious resources, with no parallel in other parts of Australia. They deserve to be protected, rather than jeopardised by industrial developments. Some of the most important sites happen to be situated in the central western sector of the Dampier coast - where they face the greatest risk of damage or degradation if industrial development is allowed to proceed in the region of James Price Point.

The proposed development should not be envisaged as an inconspicuous pipe-line. It entails the establishment of an exclusion zone (no go area) along the coast, the construction of a jetty (perhaps 2-3 km), an industrial precinct occupying 2,500 hectares of land and 1,000 hectares of sea, an extensive series of chemical processing plants and a factory to utilise by-products in the manufacture of agricultural fertiliser. The transit of heavy traffic (hundreds of trucks per day) will require the construction of the first sealed roads, and there must also be facilities to accommodate the labour-force and support staff. Then, with gas on tap, it may become economically feasible to commence bauxite mining and to build an aluminium smelter.

The proposal to site these industrial developments at James Price Point is manifestly the 'quick, cheap and easy' option. Other options exist, such as a pipe-line north-eastwards to Darwin, where the requisite infrastructure is already planned in order to exploit petroleum resources of the Timor Sea. Another option is a pipe-line south-eastwards to the Pilbara mining and industrial region. A third option is processing at the wellhead - loading the gas straight into tankers - which might be appropriate as most of it (>80%) is destined for export anyway. We urge decision-makers at all stages - federal, state and corporate - to adopt one of these (or similar) options, thus preserving the integrity of the Kimberley and its wealth of natural and scientific treasures.
______________________________________________________________

*:Taggart, D. 2009. Pristine, precious and threatened. Zoo Times (Royal Zoological Society of South Australia), March 2009: 14-15.
† Thulborn, T. 2009. Dinosaur Tracks of the Broome Sandstone, Dampier Peninsula, Western Australia - interim review. A report prepared for the Kimberley National Heritage Assessment, Natural & Indigenous Heritage Branch, Australian Federal Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage & the Arts. November 2009, 25 pp.

Dr Tony Thulborn.
19 November 2009

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Vincent Angus, Northern Tradition Law Boss


Vincent Angus, a Northern Tradition Law Boss speaking about how Kimberley Land Council staff refused himself and the other Law Bosses entry into the Goolarabooloo /Jabirr Jabirr Claimant Meeting, last Wednesday.

Eventually, the Law Bosses took their place in the meeting, only to have the Kimberley Land Council initiate a vote by a show of hands to have them removed. They stayed.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Jabirr Jabirr clan group voted to remove themselves from the original Goolarabooloo / Jabirr Jabirr Native Title Claim

Today the Jabirr Jabirr clan group voted to remove themselves from the original Goolarabooloo / Jabirr Jabirr Native Title Claim and splinter off. Following is a series of footage taken over the day, throughout the meeting, until I was asked to leave.



The Goolarabooloo claimant group application still sits in the Native Title Tribunal. Today, the real Traditional Owners for this Country in question, the Ngumbarl people (the quite ones) stood side by side with Goolarabooloo, in respect for each other position and their inherent legacies.



This meeting highlighted to me the division that this proposed LNG precinct is doing to the Indigenous communities on the Dampier Peninsula. Law Bosses from as far north as Bardi country traveled to Broome to speak and support Joseph Roe. But still, no respect was shown to them in regards to how decisions are made in regards to law & culture and the proper way in which decisions are made for country.

This video shows a lawyer addressing the gathering and asking "if they were happy if the Senior Law Men see and observe the process and sit in on the meeting?". Then the people were asked if they were happy to have the meeting filmed by anyone else?, except Kimberley Land Council ! and a show of hands were called for. Only a few raised their hands but Red Handed decided to leave because they did not want their presents, to distract from the real business.



Following the lunch break, the Jabirr Jabirr people decided to splinter off and left the meeting only to gather in the lawn in front of the Cable Beach Club, (interestingly to note that the shade tents had already been erected and were waiting) leaving the Goolarabooloo people at the conference venue.

Even when Red handed remained at a respectful distance, security were still instructed to stop me filming.



Upon their return, to the larger group, representatives from the splintering Jabirr Jabirr clan group informed the Northern Law Bosses, the Goolarabooloo custodians , the Jabirr Jabirr supporters and the rightful Traditional Owners for the Country in question, the Ngumbarl people that they had voted to splinter away from the original joint Native Title Claim and submit their own whole new claim. At this point, Kerrianne Cox, spokeswomen for the Ngumbarl people stated that they also have made the decision to stand strong and unite along alongside the Goolarabooloo Custodians and also submit a Claim.

Please note that the final section of this footage was filmed by a young Goolarabooloo women and not Red handed.