Showing posts with label broome; dampier peninsula; dinosaurs; broome dinosaurs; james price point; kimberley lng precinct; quondong; lurujarri dreaming trail; broome shire; woodside hands off country. Show all posts
Showing posts with label broome; dampier peninsula; dinosaurs; broome dinosaurs; james price point; kimberley lng precinct; quondong; lurujarri dreaming trail; broome shire; woodside hands off country. Show all posts

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Woodside puts foot down: dinosaur prints and plant can co-exist | The Australian


Woodside puts foot down: dinosaur prints and plant can co-exist | The Australian OIL and gas giant Woodside has expressed surprise at the heritage listing of dinosaur footprints through its proposed James Price Point LNG site but believes the two can co-exist.

The footprints were one of the natural and cultural values included by Environment Minister Tony Burke yesterday as he announced the national heritage listing of almost 20 million hectares of the Kimberley.

The dinosaur footprints, which run along the west coast of the Dampier Peninsula, include the intertidal area within James Price Point, 60km north of Broome.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Dinosaur footprints may be obliterated - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)


Dinosaur footprints may be obliterated - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Conservationists are concerned dinosaur footprints on the Dampier Peninsula will be affected by the gas hub (file)

Reports commissioned by the West Australian Government have concluded dinosaur footprints near the site chosen for the Kimberley gas hub are not worth preserving.

The fossilised dinosaur footprints along the coast north of Broome are recognised as some of the oldest and best preserved in the world.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

PLANNING APPROVAL – DRILL PADS, ‘TURKEY NEST’ DAMS AND TRANSPORTABLE ACCOMMODATION – LOT 259 JAMES PRICES POINT, DAMPIER PENINSULA



Agenda - Ordinary Meeting of the Broome Council Council 30 September 2010 Page 63

9.3.8 PLANNING APPROVAL – DRILL PADS, ‘TURKEY NEST’ DAMS AND TRANSPORTABLE ACCOMMODATION – LOT 259 JAMES PRICES POINT, DAMPIER PENINSULA
LOCATION/ ADDRESS: Lot No 259 James Prices Point
APPLICANT: Woodside Energy Ltd on behalf of the State of Western
Australia

FILE: DAM/259.LNG
AUTHOR: Manager Planning Services
CONTRIBUTOR/S: Lankester Planning Services on behalf of Woodside
Energy Ltd
RESPONSIBLE OFFICER: Director Development Services
DISCLOSURE OF ANY INTEREST: Nil
DATE RECEIVED: 16 September 2010

SUMMARY: Woodside Energy Ltd proposes to develop three (3) Drill Pad sites, two (2)
Turkey Nest Dams and provide transportable accommodation for a workforce to undertake hydrogeological investigations for a temporary period being a minimum of three (3) months and up to a maximum period of nine (9) months. This is part of the investigations and surveys associated with the proposed Browse LNG Precinct at James Prices Point. The hydrogeological investigations will involve drilling boreholes on the drill pad site to assess the availability of a reliable ground water supply for the proposed LNG plant and facilities. The turkey nest dams will store water pumped from the bore holes and the transportable buildings will provide accommodation for the workforce to undertake the investigations on a 24 hours basis.

The item is brought to Council for consideration as the land falls within the Shire of Broome’s Interim Development Order No 4 (IDO4).

It is recommended that Council support the development.

BACKGROUND
Previous Considerations
OCM 29 October 2009 Item 9.3.11 (Meteorological Tower – temporary)

Site and Surrounds
James Price Point is located approximately 60 kilometres north of Broome. The site on which Woodside intend to construct the drill pad sites and turkey nest dams is approximately 4.5km south of James Prices Point and 1.5km east of the Manari Road and east of the existing Meteorological Tower onsite, which was approved by Council in October 2009. The location falls within the proposed Browse LNG Development site. The land comprises natural vegetation, which consists of eucalyptus and acacia woodlands

See Attachment 1: Location Map

Description of the Proposal
It is proposed to construct three Drill Pad sites, two Turkey Nest Dams and Accommodation for the drilling workforce – these are required for the hydrogeological investigations being undertaken onsite. These investigations will assess the availability of reliable groundwater supplies for the proposed LNG Precinct, which will be used for the processing facilities, potable water for the workforce and/or low salinity water for construction activities, such as compaction and dust suppression. The Department of Water requires Woodside to undertake and to produce a hydrogeological model to support a future application for a licence to ‘take water’ for the purpose of the water supply for the proposed LNG Precinct.

Woodside propose to undertake hydrogeological investigations over a minimum period of 3 months and up to a maximum of 9 months, commencing mid October 2010
The proposal includes the following:

• Clearing a 5m wide access track, approximately 1.5km in length, eastwards from Manari Road to establish the Drill Pad sites and Turkey Nest Dams.
• The Drill Pads are situated approximately 200metres apart and located on the north side of the access track and the Two ‘Turkey Nest’ Dams are within 50m – 200m of the Drill Pad sites and situated on the south side of the access track.

Three Drill Pad Sites
• The vegetation is cleared and topsoil removed to establish three Drill Pad sites, each with an area of 70 metres x 70 metres, which will accommodate a drilling area of 50m x 55m, surrounded by a 1.8m high cyclone mesh fence or galvanized steel fence with locked gates. The Fencing is proposed for security, public safety and fauna protection. A 5m –10m wide firebreak surrounds the drilling area. The Drill Pad sites will also stockpile the topsoil and mulched vegetation, which will be used to revegetate the site at the conclusion of the drilling.

• Drilling will target two aquifers - the ‘Broome Sandstone’ and the ‘Wallal Sandstone’. A third aquifer (the Grant Group) may be drilled however, this option is considered unlikely. The investigations will include water quality, quantity, water temperature and rate of water flow and drilling will continue for 24 hours a day.
• One or two mobile drilling rigs will be used to drill bores holes within each of the three Drill Pad sites. Up to two Drill Pad sites will be operative for drilling at any one time. Associated mobile drilling equipment, one or two workshop/sea containers water tanks, and fuel storage tanks, with associated bunding, will be located temporarily on a Drill Pad site within the fenced area during the drilling operations.

‘Turkey Nest’ Dams
• Each dam is identified within an area of 180 metres x180 metres and within this area; a dam of approximately 125 metres x 150 metres will be created by clearing the vegetation and excavating to approximately 5m in depth with the excavated soil used to create the dam embankments. The site is relatively flat, however any elevated ground will be used to facilitate the dam walls.
• Vegetation which is removed from the area of the dam will be mulched and stockpiled beside the dam and will be used to revegetate the site when the dam is removed.
• Each dam will be fenced with a 1.8m high cyclone mesh fence or galvanized steel fence with locked gates. Fencing is proposed for security, public safety and fauna protection.
• The water produced during the test pumping from the bores will be collected in the Turkey Nest dam/s. The dam/s will be lined with an impermeable layer to ensure that any saline water produced from the bores will be collected in the dam/s and not contaminate the shallow freshwater aquifer. Alternatively any freshwater encountered in the bores may be discharged into nearby creek lines or surrounding bush.
• One dam is required, however depending upon the rate of flow and water quality during drilling, it may be necessary to construct a second dam. Two sites are identified for the dams and planning approval is sought for both dams.

• Transportable Buildings for the workforce Accommodation

• Transportable buildings will be used to accommodate up to 25 persons associated with the drilling which will operate on a shift basis over a 24 hour period. The onsite accommodation will avoid extended travelling to and from Broome for the workforce and will address occupation, health and safety issues for the workers. The transportable buildings - Accommodation/sleeping rooms, Ablution facilities – toilets, showers, wash basins, laundry, ‘Mess’ facilities – kitchen, dining and a Recreation block – will be appropriately cyclone rated and secured with appropriate footings. The specific details of transportable buildings will be provided at the building licence stage.
• The Transportable buildings will be established on a Drill Pad site, when the pad site is not in use for drilling. The buildings will be periodically relocated to an alternate Drill Pad site as drilling operations move between the three Drill Pad sites.
• The accommodation site will be fully serviced with power from a generator, water from the ‘potable water’ bore established as part of the drilling activities and/or from water trucked from Broome, waste water will be collected into holding tanks onsite, rubbish collected and removed from the site, and fire fighting equipment for the accommodation and the drilling activities.

Attachment 2: - Submission “Turkey Nest’ Dams, ‘Drill Pad Sites” and Onsite Workforce
Accommodation

Planning Provisions
The land is included in Interim Development Order No 4 and therefore Council approval is required.

Planning Approval for Clearing Drilling and Dams JPP-1

Friday, July 2, 2010

Dodson joins protest over Kimberley LNG hub


Nicolas Perpitch From: The Australian
July 02, 2010 12:00AM

PAT Dodson has joined other law men and claimants in court action against the Kimberley Land Council over Woodside's proposed LNG project.

They have signed on to a proposed amended claim by the gas hub's most vocal opponent, Aboriginal leader Joseph Roe, challenging the land council's right to negotiate on behalf of traditional owners.

According to court documents, Mr Roe is seeking leave from the Federal Court to amend his claim to include 16 other law bosses from the northern and southern traditions of the Dampier Peninsula song cycle.

It would also include more than 300 Goolarabooloo-Jabirr Jabirr native title claimants and people linked to those groups.

They claim the KLC had no right to negotiate with Woodside and the West Australian government on the development of the gas hub because in 2005 law bosses had made a unanimous decision against the precinct being anywhere on the peninsula.

They argue the land council did not therefore have their consent to sign a heads of agreement with the Barnett government and Woodside, which would deliver $1.5 billion in compensation to Aboriginal people. And the KLC should not have entered into a heritage protection agreement either, they say.

Under the amended claim, Mr Roe would be the sole applicant as a representative of the group. But in submissions to the court, the KLC has argued Mr Roe does not have the legal standing to sue the land council on his own.

Last month, the KLC suspended all negotiations with Woodside and the state government on an indigenous land use agreement while it dealt with the legal action.

Premier Colin Barnett said he was disappointed at the lack of progress after a fourth dead-line for Aboriginal groups to reach agreement passed on Wednesday.

Mr Barnett has said he would not grant further extensions for negotiations and would now consider whether to compulsorily acquire land at James Price Point, 60km north of Broome.

A spokesman for the land council said compulsory acquisition would take away the right of traditional owners to free and informed consent on the issue.

Mr Dodson refused to comment yesterday.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

State budget rewards polluters but punishes environment and families

In a closed briefing to business and community groups on the State budget, Premier and Treasurer Colin Barnett said that this budget strongly reflects the policy agenda of the Liberal-National Government. Sadly, an examination of the budget reveals this agenda as one that places the environment as one of the Government’s lowest priorities.

The second budget produced by the Liberal-National Government continues the established trend of running our environmental regulators on the smell of an oily rag. Much less than 2% of the overall State budget is dedicated to the increasingly impossible tasks of reducing carbon pollution, managing waste, regulating polluting industries, controlling land clearing, managing national parks, reducing air pollution, protecting the marine environment and all the other functions of the State environment portfolio.

When you consider that environmental protection is the responsibility of States under the Australian Constitution, this is grossly inadequate. The inevitable consequence of this budget frugality will be increasing impacts on our environment, increased threats to our biodiversity and health, and carbon pollution skyrocketing out of control in WA.

For a realistic assessment of the environmental consequences of this year’s budget, one must look beyond the environment portfolio. On the other side of the ecological balance sheet, the budget increases the already very significant taxpayer subsidies for polluting and destructive industries in Western Australia.

For example, the budget earmarks over $100 million towards assisting the development of a polluting LNG processing plant on the Kimberley coast – in the middle of the southern hemisphere’s most important hump-back whale calving ground. If it goes ahead, this development would be responsible for increasing WA’s greenhouse emission by 25% on its own.

Premier Barnett has stated that the Kimberley is the Government’s number one environmental priority, and a small allocation has been made to allow for the creation of a new marine park at Camden Sound, North of Broome. This funding is welcome; however the government’s environmental credentials in the Kimberley must be weighed against the heavy taxpayer investment in opening up the north for damaging and unsustainable industries.

Expenditure in the energy portfolio, which could hold the key to a clean renewable energy future, is even more alarming. The budget reveals that more than 99% of capital expenditure by the government’s energy utility will fund polluting fossil-fuel generation; less than 1% will be spent on renewable energy.

And if this is not bad enough, the budget totally fails to account for the massive economic liability that will be passed on to future Western Australians as a consequence of Western Australia’s rapidly increasing carbon pollution.

The Rudd government have delayed the introduction of an Emissions Trading Scheme for the moment, but some price on carbon will inevitably be introduced in some form in the future. Failing to disclose this cost to householders who will be forced to bear that cost because of decisions made to subsidise polluting industries today is duplicitous.

The EPA have advised that WA carbon pollution is likely to increase by an alarming 75% in the next few years. Decisions made today will determine whether Western Australia unlocks its clean energy potential, or locks into a future where Western Australian’s will be forced to pay higher and higher carbon polluting costs.

The disparity between the government’s treatment of the environment and polluting industries is echoed just about everywhere you look in the budget papers.

For example, water charges for households will be increased, but Collies rapidly expanding coal-fired power industry will continue enjoy huge volumes of water almost totally free of charge.

Mining companies receive even more handouts as part of the State Governments $80 million mining exploration incentives package (they already receive generous tax concessions for expolration activities from the Commonwealth), but taxpayers will have to pick up the bill for environmental damage caused by mining as the government continues it’s policy to exempt miners from paying bonds to cover the cost of rehabilitation.

And while families pay more for power, the budget continues the generous energy subsidies enjoyed by mining and other industries supplied from the grid in regional areas.

Financially this budget is in surplus, but that fails to account for the massive environmental and economic liability that will be transferred to future generations as a consequence of the Barnett Government’s overwhelming focus on expanding and subsidising unsustainable and polluting industries in WA.

by nevillenumbat

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Who's your eco-hero

My eco hero is a young women named Erica Fernandez who is inspiring and a real-life young leader who changed her world, at the age of 16.


When Erica found out that a liquefied natural gas facility was proposed for the coast of Oxnard and Malibu with a 36-inch pipeline routed through low-income neighborhoods, she was outraged. She worked in concert with the Sierra Club and Latino No on LNG group to mobilize the youth and Latino voice in protests and public meetings.


She organized weekly protests at the BHP Billiton offices in Oxnard, met regularly with community members, marched through neighborhoods that would be most impacted, reached out to the media, and brought more than 250 high school students to a critical rally. Her passionate testimony at the California State Lands Commission meeting was quoted in news articles, and helped convince the Commission to vote to deny the project. Next, she helped convince the California Coastal Commission to vote 12-0 against the project, and worked on a letter writing and phone call campaign to the Governor asking him to veto the project, just as the commissioners did.


Erica’s community organizing and dogged determination played a crucial role in helping her community to resist a multinational billion-dollar corporation.



Sunday, May 23, 2010

Red Hand Goes International

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is emerging as a World Best Practice approach for addressing the social and environmental impact of company activities. Companies from the oil and gas sector are very reluctant to implement and our State government refuses even to want to speak about it. The Broome Community is the only one who can really grant the social licence to operate. Woodside and the State government have to prove to us, as a community that they can operate with responsibility and integrity, so far they are failing miserably.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Gulf Air "Unsafe"

From: greenopolis.com:

Rikki Ott, marine toxicologist and Exxon Valdez survivor, talks to GreenopolisTV about the effects of air pollution due to oil spills. Rikki says based on air monitoring conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in a Louisiana coastal community, findings show that airborne levels of toxic chemicals like hydrogen sulfide, and volatile organic compounds, now far exceed safety standards for human exposure currently in those areas.


The first oil from the Gulf of Mexico spill has entered an ocean current that could take it to Florida and up the east coast of the US, scientists say. European scientists warn the spill could reach Florida within six days.

Oil has been spewing into the Gulf since the offshore drilling rig Deepwater Horizon, leased by oil giant BP, exploded off the coast of Louisiana on 20 April and sank two days later.

Satellite images released by the European Space Agency (ESA) depict a streak of oil stretching south from the main slick into the Loop Current - a body of fast-flowing water coming from the Caribbean which the agency says is likely to propel oil towards Florida within six days.

Meanwhile, astronauts and cosmonauts aboard the International Space Station have said they could see the oil spill while passing over the Gulf of Mexico.

"It looks very scary," Russian cosmonaut Oleg Kotov told reporters via a video link.

Friday, May 7, 2010

Sunrise decision 'fails legal test'

LINDSAY MURDOCH
May 7, 2010

THE regulator of East Timor's petroleum industry has accused Woodside of failing to comply with its legal obligations before announcing plans to build a floating liquefied natural gas platform above the Timor Sea's Greater Sunrise field.

In a confidential letter seen by BusinessDay, the independent National Petroleum Authority criticised Woodside for failing to provide regulators with detailed reports and its findings on all three possible development plans for the field before deciding on the floating platform.

East Timor's leaders have repeatedly demanded the gas be piped to a processing plant in East Timor and say they will not approve either a floating platform or piping the gas to Darwin, which the Woodside-led consortium also considered.

As accusations swirl around the multibillion-dollar joint venture, East Timor's Prime Minister, Xanana Gusmao, refused to meet Woodside chief executive Don Voelte in Dili yesterday, saying he would not compromise the "integrity" of "negotiation mechanisms".

A group of about 200 protesters prevented Mr Voelte (pictured right) and representatives of the other joint-venture partners from leaving Dili's VIP airport lounge for almost two hours yesterday.

After the tense standoff, the group was eventually allowed to leave for a meeting with East Timor's President, Jose Ramos Horta, who has asked for briefings on the project.

"We wanted Mr Voelte and his party to know that Timorese demand the gas be piped to East Timor to promote our economic growth and jobs," said Vincente Mauboci, the group's spokesman.

In a confidential letter dated May 4, Mr Gusmao told Mr Voelte he was "surprised" by the company's announcement about a floating platform and said he was convinced "there must have been a wrongful interpretation" of the Greater Sunrise agreement.

Comments by Mr Gusmao and other East Timorese political leaders about Greater Sunrise have fuelled nationalist sentiment in the nation of 1 million people.

Some influential Timorese believe that development of the field should be delayed and say the government in Dili should not be afraid of walking away from the deal in which East Timor and Australia would equally share $US40 billion ($A44 billion) in revenue.

East Timor is debt free and has almost $US6 billion of oil and gas revenue invested in the US, which is increasing by $US100 million a month.

But local institutions lack the capacity to provide the services and infrastructure needed to lift the majority of Timorese from poverty.

In his letter to Mr Voelte, Mr Gusmao, a former guerilla commander and revolutionary hero, challenged Woodside's pledge that building a floating platform would boost Timorese employment and training skills.

"As far as we know, from 2002 until now, there have only been seven Timorese officers working as trainees in ConocoPhillips," Mr Gusmao said, referring to Woodside's consortium partner.

"This suggests to us that the best we can look forward to under your concept is having another seven Timorese working with you.''

Gulf Oil Spill - Where's The Latest Imagery?


For the most reliable up todate information about the Gulf Oil Spill follow

http://blog.skytruth.org/2010/05/gulf-oil-spill-wheres-latest-imagery.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed& utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Skytruth+%28SkyTruth%29.
both on their site and on tweeter.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

We beg your patience. Our main source of imagery is from the NASA satellites, Terra and Aqua, that carry the MODIS sensor. This sensor measures visible to infrared wavelengths of light, so when it's cloudy or hazy in the Gulf, we get a nice picture of...clouds and haze. MODIS images also show a distinct pattern of glittery sunglint on the water (when there are no clouds in the way, and the geometry with the sun is just right). This can be very useful for mapping oil slicks because the oil flattens out the water, and will appear either very dark or very bright (depending, again, on the sun angle). But other things can make the water flat: calm winds, for example. So if we get a MODIS image that suffers from too many of these quality problems, we don't process and post it because it's not providing useful information about the spill.

See our Twitter feed (just glance to your right!) - that's where we post updates and info that's briefer and more timely than these blog entries. Follow us on Twitter and when we know it, you'll know it.

Friday, April 23, 2010

How long is a piece of string, how big is the hole in the bucket



PROPOSED BROWSE LNG PRECINCT, Walmadan (James Price Point)


All is quiet on the western front and the silence is almost deafening as some major spanners play their imperative and indispensable role in slowing down the whole process for the proposed development of a LNG precinct at Walmadan (James Price Point).

All the humbug happening with regards to all the Native Title business has in all reality stopped the final formulation and content of the Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA). The ILUA has to provide the formal legal consent required under the Native Title Act 1993 for the valid establishment of the proposed LNG precinct at Walmadan (James Price Point) and the valid grant of the titles by the state to project proponents.

How valid then is both the Heads of Agreement and the Heritage Protection Agreement signed by the State, Woodside and the KLC (Kimberley Land Council)?

Meanwhile, in the Legislative Council on Tuesday the 20th of this week the Hon Robin Chapple asked several questions to the Minister for Mines and Petroleum, Hon Norman Moore about the proposed LNG Precinct at James Price Point. Department of State Development
(File Notation Area 8589).

Robin Chapple
Q 1. What is the total area (land and sea) covered by area 8589 ‘Proposed LNG Precinct’?

Norman Moore
A 1. 466.91 square kilometers, which is 46,691 hectares.

Robin Chapple
Q 2. Is the land area covered by area 8589 ‘Proposed LNG Precinct’ approximately 258.2 square kilometres?

Hon Norman Moore
A 2. The land area covered by File Notation Area 8589 is 262.8147 square kilometers which is 26,281 hectares

This is a lot more area than the Premier Colin Barnett has led the public to believe. Barnett stated on the Oct. 15 2008 “the precinct would be built on about 1,000 hectares, which he said was a small amount of land “in an area twice the size of Victoria state.”

on Dec 19 2008 “a 10km strip of land at James Price Point offered a range of potential development”.


on the Dec, 23rd 2008 "a balance of factors, had led to the choice of James Price for the 1,000 to 2,000 hectare industrial estate.”

And on the Wed 15 April, “The precinct at James Price Point would occupy about 1,000 hectares. With accommodation, ancillary services and an appropriate land and sea buffer, the total area may be up to 3,500 hectares.”

On the 12 April, 2010
The Hon Martin Ferguson, Minister for Resources and Energy Minister for Tourism stated “James Price Point represents about 2000 hectares of the Kimberley. That is, in essence, 0.0005 per cent of the Kimberley land mass and if a gas hub actually goes ahead it'll have to meet all the appropriate environmental considerations required by the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act”.

According to the Kimberley Social Impact Assessment Vol 1.
Scope and Profile July 2009
, page 25
the precinct will be around 2000-2500 hectares of land and approximately 1000 hectares of sea will be required for port facilities. It is anticipated that each operator would occupy 500 hectares including key infrastructure separation buffers. Precinct land area will also include infrastructure corridors, laydown areas and possible heritage protection land areas totaling 500 to 1500 hectares.

On the Department of State development website
states: The total land area of the precinct, will be about 2,000 to 2,500 hectares - just 0.2 per cent of the 1,400,000 hectare Dampier Peninsula.

In the Browse LNG Public Information Booklet
states on page 8
The Precinct will comprise areas of exclusive and non-exclusive access.
The exclusion zone is proposed to contain:
an industrial precinct (fenced) being:
two industrial blocks with each block exclusively accommodating stand-alone facilities for the relevant proponent allocated to the block (total of approximately 1,000ha); and common user area (service corridors, lay down areas and internal buffer areas,
being a total of approximately 500 - 1,000ha); and
land (fenced) and waters of the port (area to be determined but likely to be approximately 1,000ha).
The non-exclusion zone (unfenced) is proposed to contain:
workers. accommodation (up to 200ha);
light industrial area (up to 200ha);
access roads; and a buffer zone around the exclusion zone (approximately 3,000ha).


Tourism Impact Assessment – Kimberley Liquefied Natural Gas Project 2009, page 21 states: The James Price Point area about 60km north of Broome covers about 25,000 hectares or 250 km2, itself only a small part of the 13,000 sq km Dampier Peninsula.

According to Kimberley Land Council’s Aboriginal Social Impact Assessment Fact Sheet # 1. the following areas would be set aside for the gas precinct:

• Processing plants: 1000 hectares
• Infrastructure and facilities 500 – 1000 hectares
• Land and water for port 1000 hectares
• Workers accommodation, light industrial area etc: 200 – 500 hectares.

This gives a total area of between 2700 – 3500 hectares, which would be fenced and another 3000 hectares for the Buffer Zone.


Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct (BLNG) (notice the name change) – Infrastructure Assessment Study,
8th Feb 2010, page 6 under the Heading The BLNG Precinct Location states the BLNG precinct will cover an area between Coloumb Point and Quondong Beach, south of James Price Point. There is no mention of the size of the area within this document.

So it seems that no one knows precisely how big this precinct will be? And more importantly no one has any idea precisely where the Precinct will be located, so how can people make informed decisions?

And whilst on the subject, where is the Department of State Development’s BLNG document Project Description including Emissions, Discharges and Waste, released on Jan 2010 and why isn’t this document available on the DSD website?

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Expression of Concern at Proposal to Construct Gas-Processing Hub at James Price Point, on the coast of the Dampier Peninsula, in the Kimberley Region

17-25 September 2009
This document expresses concern at the recently-announced proposal to exploit natural petroleum gas resources of the Browse Basin by installing a pipe-line and gas-processing hub on the coast of the Dampier Peninsula, Western Australia.




This expression of concern is directed to the State Government of Western Australia, the Federal Government of Australia, and all or any of their corporate industrial partners who may be engaged in exploiting mineral resources of the Browse Basin.

Signatories to this document are professional scientists with special research interests in geological and biological evidence relating to the discipline of Vertebrate Palaeontology (the study of extinct vertebrate animals) and, more specifically, in terrestrial ecosystems of the Mesozoic Era (the 'Age of Dinosaurs'). These shared concerns are expressions of personal opinion and should not be interpreted as the views of any particular organizations or professional bodies.


Recently the State Government of Western Australia announced a well-advanced proposal to exploit natural gas resources of the Browse Basin by installing a pipe-line and gas-processing plant in the region of James Price Point, on the western coast of the Dampier Peninsula. The announcement provoked widespread and serious concern because Dampier Land is the western part of the Kimberley region, recognized internationally as one of the last five great wilderness areas remaining on this planet.* The first geological survey of the Dampier region was undertaken as recently as 1947, and much of the Kimberley remains unexplored to this day. Recent ecological investigations (2007-09) reported "amazing" diversity of animals and "countless" new and hitherto unknown species of plants.* In addition the Kimberley coastline was described as "spectacular and fragile". It seems singularly inappropriate to site major industrial developments in such a pristine environment, especially as its natural resources still await scientific investigation.

The proposal for a gas-processing hub mentioned merely that there were reports of dinosaur tracks in the area. In fact, the Dampier coast has provided practically the entire fossil record of dinosaurs in the western half of the Australian continent (the exceptions being a few small fragments of bone). Coastal exposures of the Broome Sandstone between Broome and Cape Leveque yield unique and richly informative insights into terrestrial ecosystems of Early Cretaceous age (approximately 132 million years old) and have been the focus of ongoing scientific research since 1991. The ancient Cretaceous landscapes were buried intact, and today those fossil landscapes are being exhumed by coastal erosion, revealing the original topography, with soils, leaf-litter and plants such cycads and ferns still in their original position of growth. The sites also contain evidence of invertebrate animals and crocodiles, but the most impressive fossils are the tracks of dinosaurs, some of them in densely-packed profusion. There are at least 15 different types of dinosaur tracks, representing every major group of the Dinosauria.† Some types are extremely rare, even unique; others represent dinosaurs that ranked among the largest yet known to science. Today one may walk across those ancient landscapes, following the tracks of dinosaurs as they meandered between the clumps of vegetation more than 130 million years ago. Few sites on Earth afford such opportunities to explore ancient terrestrial ecosystems in such complete and undisturbed condition.

The dino-saurian track-sites of the Dampier coast are rare and precious resources, with no parallel in other parts of Australia. They deserve to be protected, rather than jeopardised by industrial developments. Some of the most important sites happen to be situated in the central western sector of the Dampier coast - where they face the greatest risk of damage or degradation if industrial development is allowed to proceed in the region of James Price Point.

The proposed development should not be envisaged as an inconspicuous pipe-line. It entails the establishment of an exclusion zone (no go area) along the coast, the construction of a jetty (perhaps 2-3 km), an industrial precinct occupying 2,500 hectares of land and 1,000 hectares of sea, an extensive series of chemical processing plants and a factory to utilise by-products in the manufacture of agricultural fertiliser. The transit of heavy traffic (hundreds of trucks per day) will require the construction of the first sealed roads, and there must also be facilities to accommodate the labour-force and support staff. Then, with gas on tap, it may become economically feasible to commence bauxite mining and to build an aluminium smelter.

The proposal to site these industrial developments at James Price Point is manifestly the 'quick, cheap and easy' option. Other options exist, such as a pipe-line north-eastwards to Darwin, where the requisite infrastructure is already planned in order to exploit petroleum resources of the Timor Sea. Another option is a pipe-line south-eastwards to the Pilbara mining and industrial region. A third option is processing at the wellhead - loading the gas straight into tankers - which might be appropriate as most of it (>80%) is destined for export anyway. We urge decision-makers at all stages - federal, state and corporate - to adopt one of these (or similar) options, thus preserving the integrity of the Kimberley and its wealth of natural and scientific treasures.
______________________________________________________________

*:Taggart, D. 2009. Pristine, precious and threatened. Zoo Times (Royal Zoological Society of South Australia), March 2009: 14-15.
† Thulborn, T. 2009. Dinosaur Tracks of the Broome Sandstone, Dampier Peninsula, Western Australia - interim review. A report prepared for the Kimberley National Heritage Assessment, Natural & Indigenous Heritage Branch, Australian Federal Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage & the Arts. November 2009, 25 pp.

Dr Tony Thulborn.
19 November 2009