![]() |
Port Drive, OTS site Photo: Redhanded Jan 2014 |

![]() |
Port Drive, OTS site Photo: Redhanded Jan 2014 |
Buru Energy
The shares appear to have been marked down as traders have bailed out of many stocks regardless of fundamentals, desperate to lock in any profit for fear of it evaporating.
Up 200%, but down 50% in the last year
Buru shares have trebled since early 2011, but are down a whopping 50% over the past 12 months, making the company the second worst oil and gas sector company in the S&P / ASX 200 Index (Index:^AXJO) (ASX:XJO) over the past year.
Premier Colin Barnett was quick to talk up the Canning Basin’s shale gas potential when Woodside walked away from an onshore gas plant at James Price Point, saying it was inevitable those resources would be exploited.
While he has pointed to the US shale boom, industry experts say the Canning Basin has a different geology and is unlikely to replicate the same level of success.
Western Australia is on the brink of an explosion in gas fracking activity. Fracking has already begun in some of our most beautiful, fertile, and special places – the Kimberley, our famed Wildflower region, and the Carnarvon food bowl.
If industry and the Department of Mines and Petroleum get their way, then WA will have a US-style ‘fracking frenzy’, with tens of thousands of wells over our farms and the landscapes we love.
The Government must ensure that we’re protected from this industry that threatens our air, water and land.
Scientists, farmers and communities across Australia have expressed concern about the impact of fracking on both our health and the environment – but the Government has ignored community concern and pushed fracking proposals through without proper environmental assessment.
We want the WA Government to follow New South Wales, and countries like France and Germany, and adopt a moratorium on fracking to protect our land and water.
http://cleanwaterhealthyland.org.au/node/148882
It is incumbent upon us as members of society to have honest and open conversation about what we do know and what we don't know, what the risks are or may be, and what our strategy for confronting those risks or mitigating those risks will be.
Unfortunately, the conversation is a little too shrill, and a little too cast in the context of extremes, and I think this continues to inhibit meaningful progress and meaningful discussion about what we need to do about what lies ahead.
I may be repeating myself here, but the basic physics of greenhouse warming are very straightforward. The data we have make it very clear that the earth is warming. The data and the physics make it very clear that the bulk of the warming is being caused by human activity.
As former ICAC Commissioner David Ipp told Linton Besser:
"One begins to fear that corruption might be far more widespread than was at first thought."
The now retired Commissioner is not the only one concerned. Besser interviews former top NSW bureaucrat Kerry Schott, who resisted corrupting influences only to find herself the subject of spurious corruption allegations.
We also hear from former Premier Kristina Keneally, respected Labor Senator John Faulkner, and Liberal Senator Bill Heffernan, who helped blow the whistle on corruption eating into his own party.
Warning about the dangers in the current system, he says:
"The most important qualification in public life, is not to have a price... every now and then you've got to have a cleanout, and at the present time there's a bit of a cleanout going on."
Significantly, there is no Federal commission to fight corruption. The key questions now are how far will the clean up go and is there the political will to reform the regulations that govern political donations?
DEMOCRACY FOR SALE, reported by Linton Besser and presented by Kerry O'Brien, goes to air on Monday 23rd June at 8.30pm on ABC1. It is replayed on Tuesday 24th June at 11.00am and 11.35pm. It can also be seen on ABC News 24 on Saturday at 8.00pm, ABC iview and at abc.net.au/4corners.
State governments have spent nearly $18 billion supporting mining and energy companies over the past six years, The Australia Institute says.
The research body has published a new paper called Mining the Age of Entitlement: State Government Assistance to the Minerals and Fossil Fuel Sector.
This is the first time anyone has attempted to put a dollar figure on the value of state government assistance to fossil fuel and mining companies across the country.
Foreign Minister Julie Bishop warned last week that Australia would lead international talks in November on reducing ''inefficient'' subsidies to the global oil industry, saying fossil fuel subsidies were distorting energy markets and encouraging ''wasteful consumption''.
The institute's paper, to be published on Tuesday, shows that since 2008-09, the Queensland government has provided more than $9.5 billion in direct support to mining and energy companies, while the Western Australia government has provided more than $6.2 billion.
The Abbott Government last night passed a bill through the Lower House to hand federal environmental approval powers to the states, ignoring the World Heritage Committee’s concern about this environmentally disastrous plan.
“UNESCO is currently meeting to decide whether to downgrade the Great Barrier Reef’s World Heritage status to ‘In Danger’ and has expressed concern about the Abbott Government’s hasty handover of federal approval powers to the states,” Senator Larissa Waters, Australian Greens environment spokesperson, said.
“But Tony Abbott is ignoring this international expert concern and forging ahead with his plan to give state premiers the final say over destructive projects threatening our World Heritage Areas and threatened species.
“Leaving the fate of the Great Barrier Reef in the hands of Campbell ‘we’re in the coal business’ Newman would put this already struggling World Heritage Area in grave danger.
“Federal environmental approval powers have been in place for more than 30 years and saved the Reef from being scarred with oil rigs in the Bjelke-Petersen era.
“With Tony Abbott’s bill to put the states or even local governments in charge, environmental standards would drop and the fox would be in charge of the hen house Senator Waters said.
The richest 1% of Australians now own the same wealth as the bottom 60%, according to a new report designed to bolster the case for global and domestic action to shrink the gap between rich and poor.
The Oxfam Australia report also indicated that the nation’s nine richest individuals had a net worth of US$54.8bn, which was more than the combined bottom 20% of the population, or 4.54m people.
The report, released on Monday, follows previous warnings by Oxfam International that the 85 richest people in the world now own the same as half of the world’s population, or 3.5bn people.
“Income inequality in Australia has been on the rise since the mid-1990s, despite all sections of Australian society experiencing some increase in income during the same period,” the report said.
“In 1995, Australia had an average level of inequality compared to other wealthy OECD member countries. Today, we are below average, having become less equal than our peers despite having a better-performing economy than most.”
The Australian and Western Australian governments have agreed to a strategic assessment to find a suitable site for a liquefied natural gas precinct to service the Browse Basin gas reserves off the Kimberley coast, and to ensure that this site is appropriately managed.
JUST ON ABC KIMBERLEY NEWS AT 1120
3 INDEPENDENT DELEGATES have been appointed by the WA EPA to do a Environmental Impact Assessment of James Price Point for use as a Common User Hub.
The chairman of the assessors is Jarrad Ealy.
This is a strategic assessment and they have been given no deadline to complete the assessment.
PS. To keep up to date on the Bentley situation over the next few critical days, please like and follow the Lock the Gate Facebook page.
PSS. To contribute to the campaign to support communities at risk of unsafe drilling around Australia, please consider becoming a Gate Keeper today.
HAHAHA funniest thing I've ever read.
In todays Broome Advertiser the dunce Procter whinging about companies leaving town because of the "blow-in hippie rabble of well heeled greenies from Sydney's north shore" have scared them all off by stopping the JPP LNG disaster from happening.
Hahaha according to Coleman Woodside spent "almost $2 billion to get James Price Point to work. I don't know how people can expect companies to spend any more money than that trying to make a development commercially viable.
"James Price Point simply didn't work. Period. So talking about local content in the context of a project that won't get built is kind of a hollow discussion."
SO what's Proctor banging on about?
Well him and his spouse Bloom set up an "oil and gas consultancy" that promoted the LNG plant and trumpeted it to the high heavens and back.
Of course there wasn't a well informed analyst anywhere on the planet that believed the plant at JPP would proceed.
The Shire followed Proctors advice to the tune of $8 million and have zero to show for it.
SO Proctor is pissed that the "blow-in hippie rabble of well heeled greenies from Sydney's north shore" know more about building LNG plants than him or his partner Bloom.
How embarrassing!
And worse - the rabble of greenies gave the Shire all the "good oil" on exactly what would happen to the doomed plant FOR FREE !
If that wasn't embarrassing enough the Proctor/Bloom grand plan for Chinatown has come unstuck as their mate designed it all in Japanese by mistake.
This was rumoured to cost $4million.(I'm guessing this one as there seems to be a news blackout on the details and according to the Advertiser some time back that was the plan).
It was said at the time "why pay some dickhead from bloody Austria or somewhere $4 million to design Chinatown when the Chinese community would have gladly given suggestions for free?"
HOW MUCH LONGER MUST WE PUT UP WITH "DUMB AND DUMBER"?
Redhand:
Thanks for this great comment and would just like to remind Proctor/Bloom that if Woodside had gone ahead they would have sunk their corporation and Broome would have gone down with them.
Woodside chief Peter Coleman said "We invested about 4.5 million man hours and had hundreds of Woodsiders who dedicated years trying to come up with a way to make this land-based development commercially viable," Woodside vice-president Roger Martin wrote in an opinion piece in The West Australiannewspaper. "When the final number came in at more than $80 billion, it was obvious these efforts were in vain. " Martin said that modelling showed Woodside’s share of developing the project was estimated at $25 billion, almost as much as the whole market value of the company. "Effectively, we would have spent almost the entire value of our company on an uneconomic project," he wrote.
The emergence of March in March is both a hopeful story for progressive Australia and a phenomenon that the right ridicules at its peril. Abbott had reached a hundred days in office, and discontent at the rapid pace of policy change from a coalition that had promised “no surprises, no excuses” was fermenting.
Australia’s treatment of asylum seekers sent to offshore processing centers is cruel, inhuman and degrading and it violates international law, the United Nations’ human rights office said Friday.
It called for an investigation and punishment of those responsible for an outbreak of violence at a center in Papua New Guinea that houses asylum seekers sent there after trying to get to Australia.
Clashes between inmates and guards at the Manus Island processing center in Papua New Guinea this week left one person dead and 77 injured. Ravina Shamdasani, a spokeswoman for the United Nations human rights office in Geneva, noted reports that private security guards employed at the Manus Island center were involved in the violence and added that “states maintain their human rights obligations when they privatize delivery of services such as security, and must take steps to investigate, redress and punish human rights abuses by third parties.” Prime Minister Tony Abbott elected in 2013 partly on the promise of a tough policy toward migrants and asylum seekers, said the government would not succumb to “moral blackmail” and would ensure that the camps were run “fairly, if necessary, firmly.”
To anyone who drinks water, the rusted, leaky underground tanks storing underground fuel are the “single largest threat” to its safety. To major oil companies, they’re an opportunity to profit.
Reuters has an exclusive report on the despicable fraud being carried out by Big Oil. Call it “double-dipping”: When toxic, potentially carcinogenic leaks of gas and diesel threaten aquifers, the companies accept government funds to clean it up. Then, they apply for a second payout from the insurance companies. And all the big guys, it seems, are going for it: Chevron, Exxon, ConocoPhillips and Sunoco have agreed to settlements over the past three years totaling over $105 million.
"What we know from other parts of the world is industry best practice means contaminated ground water, serious air pollution, health impacts on communities and serious environmental disturbance, so we don't think industry best practice is going to be acceptable here for Western Australia," he said.
Mr Verstegen said the council estimated there could be 100,000 wells drilled in the Kimberley in the north of the state when commercial shale gas production gets underway based on well density in the US.
But he said the figure may be out by "50 per cent".
What they said
With a victory confirmed for Abbott, congratulations and gentle reminders to get on with the job have been pouring in thick and fast.
“A focus on reducing the cost of doing business and increasing exploration activity need to be a priority for the Coalition government in order to enable the continued growth of the resources sector in Western Australia,” Chamber of Minerals and Energy of WA chief executive Reg Howard-Smith said.
His Queensland counterpart expressed similar sentiments, adding that Abbott should not buy into an environmental scare campaign being waged over the Great Barrier Reef.
“Now the campaign is over, the work begins to put policy rubber on the road and the Abbott government can be assured of the support and encouragement of the QRC and its members,” Queensland Resources Council CEO Michael Roche said.
The Australian Mines and Metals Association insisted that Abbott had a clear mandate to implement sweeping change, urging him to use his power for the betterment of the resources sector.
“The Abbott government has a clear mandate to restore confidence back into Australia’s resource industry and back into our country as a globally competitive and productive place to do business,” AMMA CEO Steve Knott said.
“We encourage the Coalition to hit the ground running and begin implementing a policy framework that will both attract investment into new resources exploration and also ensure Australia reaps the benefits of a strong production and export phase.”
The consequences of the James Price Point decision on other projects
This case puts a spot light on past, present and future assessment practices and raises questions about the certainty of decision-making in Western Australia.
For the Browse LNG Precinct (if this is to be further pursued by the State, given the Premier's recent statement apologising for the Precinct's failure), it's back to square one. The EPA will have to completely reassess the proposal (without the involvement of the conflicted members and arguably without the involvement of the Chairman).
For the EPA, it's back to basics. This decision may trigger a wholesale review of EPA practices (not just those in respect to conflict of interest).
As a result, proponents who have proposals in the pipeline may find the process delayed as the EPA sorts itself out. Even those proponents with a fresh approval in their hands might find that they are subject to challenge. Either way, they will need to be prepared for what might turn out to be lengthy and expensive delays in their approval process, and be more vigilant to ensure similar mistakes don't vitiate any future approvals.
Clive Hamilton, an Australian public intellectual and author of several books on climate change, wrote:
“To environment groups it’s been apparent for some years that the traditional methods of campaigning have been woefully inadequate in securing a political response anywhere nearly proportionate to the threat posed by global warming. For those open to the implications of the scientific warnings, a sense of despair can take over when they see once again the failure of governments to protect the future wellbeing of their citizens and the extraordinary power fossil fuel corporations exercise over government decisions.”
What are the different types of compulsory acquisition?
The Native Title Act makes different rules for two different types of compulsory acquisition these have a quite different impact on native title:
Under Government acquisitions for other people, like mining companies or developers the law provides that the parties have certain rights including the right to negotiate.
The right to negotiate is when the Native Title Act requires that the parties (which will include the State and the developer) have to negotiate in good faith with the native title holders with a view to reaching an agreement.
Under these processes the parties; the State and the Miner or Developer and the native title party (which is the Applicant in a registered native title claim) have a certain amount of time to reach an agreement on deciding how the if the act can be done, and what conditions can be imposed.
If the parties cannot reach agreement in six months then the question of if the act can proceed, which in this case is the compulsory acquisition of the land, can then be made by the National Native Title Tribunal.
Compulsory acquisition for the Government purposes – this is generally when the Government takes land to use for Government purposes, which are often called public works. In this case the native title holders are provided with less rights and the right to negotiate will not apply to the compulsory acquisition.
Commenting on the State Agreement, Buru’s Executive Director, Mr Eric Streitberg, said:
“We welcome and endorse the Premier’s comments that “this legislation will bring about the continued exploration for natural gas in the Canning Basin, the development of a gas pipeline to the Pilbara, and ensure Western Australian consumers have first use of any gas discovered”.
Buru is undertaking a systematic and comprehensive exploration and appraisal program in the Canning Basin and has identified both a large gas resource which is the focus of the State Agreement, and a significant oilfield at Ungani which is currently under development. We look forward to continuing to develop these resources to bring value to all the stakeholders involved in the project.”
The Wilderness Society and Goolarabooloo Traditional Custodian Richard Hunter are continuing their legal challenge against the WA Environment Minister and the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) over the way the gas hub was approved.
Their initial reaction was to ‘adjourn’ (put on hold) the Supreme Court case since Woodside’s decision meant there was no chance of a development there for the foreseeable future.
However, the WA state government has insisted the case be heard NOW, in order to secure approvals and access for the JPP site so they can still use it for a potential supply base for offshore gas operations and refinery for onshore shale gas from the canning Basin.
The landmark case will therefore be heard by the Chief Justice of the WA Supreme Court from June 4-6. A month of deliberation before a decision is made is likely.
Between 60-80% of coal, oil and gas reserves of publicly listed companies are ‘unburnable’ if the world is to have a chance of not exceeding global warming of 2°C
Broome, Western Australia 6725 |
come along to the Divers Tavern from 6.30pm on Thursday May 9th, to say thanks to yourself and everyone else involved in getting the Campaign to where it is today. ntry $20 if you have a job, $10 if you don't, all proceeds to help pay outstanding legal fees associated with the Campaign. More details to be posted when they are finalised. |
Taken from Finding Beauty in a Broken World by Terry Tempest Williams (2008)
“I’ve been thinking about words, individual words and the language we use when talking about nature, how lnaguage shapes perceptions. A word enters my mind: “hypography” - \hi-pah-grah-fee\ n: 1) any public lands given over to corporate interests at the public’s expense; 2) landscape once pristine, now abused by grazing, clear cuts, strip mines, toxic waste dumps, or oil and gas development; a state of extreme corruption fueled by bureaucrats.”
Flawed Gas Hub Development Steamroller Continues to Flatten Local
Recently re-elected Greens WA Member for the Mining and Pastoral Region Robin Chapple MLC has expressed dismay at last night’s turn of events in the James Price Point saga.
“I am deeply saddened that yet again, the people of Broome have been pushed to breaking point by the heavy-handed tactics of the Barnett-Grylls government, as shown by the public disturbance reported at yesterday’s meeting of the Kimberley Joint Development Assessment Panel,” Mr Chapple said.
“It’s no wonder some people react bitterly, when they see their democratically elected Council sidelined by these unrepresentative bodies.“The Government should take heed of yesterday’s fracas, because it is surely but a precursor to what will happen around the state, as more and more vital decisions affecting people’s day-to-day lives are taken out of their hands and given to so-called “experts”, with locally elected citizens in the minority.
“In this instance, we have the laughable proposition that it is somehow OK to drop a Fly-in Fly-out (FIFO) camp for nearly 1,000 workers into the middle of an “Agricultural” zoned area adjoining small rural properties where people are pursuing organic horticultural activities.
“Unfortunately, we shouldn’t be surprised, as the whole James Price Point venture has clearly been flawed from the outset and only continues today thanks to the blinkered, fanatical determination of the Premier,” Mr Chapple concluded.
http://newmatilda.com//2013/04/03/welfare-or-gas-money
Professor Flannery said in a statement that it was critical for emergency and health services, as well as the public, to have the best information from scientists.
''Ignoring it or shooting the messenger will not reduce the threat of climate change, it will just mean that Australia is less prepared,'' he said. ''We'd be living in the past to think that Australia did not need to prepare for a changing climate.''
Professor Flannery, a palaeontologist and author who was Australian of the Year in 2007, has been seen as a polarising figure by some because of his calls to phase out large-scale use of fossil fuels.
Photo Damian Kelly
Palaeontologist, Dr Steve Salisbury from the University of Queensland, Goolarabooloo Lawman, Richard Hunter and Scientist and former Australian of the year Tim Flannery on the Goolorabooloo coast early morning over Easter examining dinosaur footprints in collaboration with Broome Dinosaur Trackers.
A Climate Commission report released on Wednesday examined links between Australia's extreme weather and human-induced climate change. It found natural events were being influenced by climate change, because greenhouse gases are accumulating and trapping extra energy in the Earth's atmosphere and oceans.
Commenting on the $1.3 billion benefits package that traditional owners were bound to receive for giving consent to Woodside and the State government’s LNG Precinct development project, Professor Pat Dodson, Broome Yawuru elder, told ABC Radio National's 360:
"Just a lot of rearrangement of public sector funding. Most of it is just a rearrangement of what governments would be required to outlay if they’re going to address the inequities that are already in existence. I have a difficulty as a citizen having to go and beg for a government to provide me with the services that I require to have an equality of life in my own Country."
Commenting on the $1.3 billion benefits package that traditional owners were bound to receive for giving consent to Woodside and the State government’s LNG Precinct development project, Professor Pat Dodson, Broome Yawuru elder, told ABC Radio National's 360:
"Just a lot of rearrangement of public sector funding. Most of it is just a rearrangement of what governments would be required to outlay if they’re going to address the inequities that are already in existence. I have a difficulty as a citizen having to go and beg for a government to provide me with the services that I require to have an equality of life in my own Country."
Stopping James Price Point proposed LNG greenfield would be a major step towards stopping large scale destruction of the environment and distortion of the Kimberley economy and the erosion of our democracy.
We are all concerned about the social and economic issues faced by indigenous communities. We all accept the need to tackle the continuing profound and shameful legacy of hundreds of years of dispossession, denial and despair but we do not accept that the best way to close the gap is by digging a deeper hole, poising the water and polluting the air.
Australia can and must forge a future that embraces indigenous cultural and ecological knowledge and heritage and takes a different approach to managing our precious country for all generations to come - and we believe this is a journey that must be taken together.
The families who signed off on the 1.5 billion dollar deal to give up land at James Price Point for an LNG precinct remain divided over whether it should proceed. They’ve applied to the Federal Court to abandon their joint native title claim so those for and against the project can lodge rival claims over the land. The state government and Woodside have lodged objections to this in a bid to hold the land deal together. In its submission the government has asked to have the court hearing adjourned past the 18th of April, which is the deadline for new native title claims to be lodged. If successful the move would block opponents like Joseph Roe from gaining negotiation rights.
TODAY, Two Police officers in unmarked vehicle visited Walmadany Tent Embassy. Past experience tells us, plans are being made by police to do the bidding of the state by providing protection for corporate interests and alienating the community. EXPECT INVASION SOON. Time to plan, pack your bags and get back into Country to protect the dunes and established support camps. Broome people if you see large equipment, dongas, drill rigs, medical centre donga, barge movements etc, either in Broome or on the Highway, pls txt 0487 604 679 or 0415 998 007. Also, establish your own gas information network on your own phone and social media networks to ensure maximum flow of information and support.
Beautiful images for the Concert for the Kimberley 24/02/13
Updated on Monday · Taken at Esplanade Park
Featuring John Butler Trio, Missy Higgins and Ball Park Music // Photos by Colosoul photographer Kieran Peek (Kieran Peek Photography)
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10151287638886361.451955.281832706360&type=1
"In Australia, by law, you only own the top metre. Everything underneath, that is owned by the people of Australia," Peter Strachan, a resources analyst at Perth-based StockAnalysis, said.
"If someone puts in a request to explore on your land, you have to deal with that and make sure you're compensated for access."
Groups seeking access to private land in Western Australia must seek the approval of the Warden's Court, which deals with disputes over and applications for mining leases, and negotiate compensation with the owner.
Free event open to all. Exciting news - Dr Bob Brown is coming to Broome next week. There's an opportunity to catch up with him and locals to talk about the future of the Kimberley. How do we create economy that protects our land, sea and provide culturally appropriate employment?. Bring your family to listen to some music and together establish a positive vision for the future of the Kimberley. Broome style curries available and cakes. More details to come. |
Peter Kerr, The West Australian February 20, 2013
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/business/a/-/national/16187223/govt-at-odds-with-unions-on-flng/
The Gillard Government has stared down union demands to force petroleum giants such as Royal Dutch Shell to process huge gas reserves onshore to boost local jobs, paving the way for the use of floating LNG on Woodside's $40 billion Browse project.
Unions have attacked the Government in recent weeks over the issue, saying FLNG would cost jobs at the expense of overseas shipbuilding yards. They wanted the Government to use its manufacturing support policy, released this week, to force the issue. But the policy did not contain any references to FLNG or other union and industry demands to force petroleum companies to provide cheap gas.
Research by The Australia Institute suggests that slowing down the pace of coal exports would actually result in enormous benefits to the Australian economy. It would allow our other key export industries – including manufacturing, tourism, education and agriculture – to expand, employing more people and paying more tax.
Because these industries are all far more labour intensive than mining, less subsidised and mostly better taxpayers than mining, it would lead to more jobs and increasing state and federal revenue in the long run.
“Woodside's Section 18 approval of grave disturbing works flies in the face of previous recommendations and Court decisions not to allow mining in the area due to its cultural and environmental significance,” said Mr Chapple.
“I am appalled at the ACMC’s recommendations to permit the works to go ahead. In 1991, the ACMC recommended that no exploration activity should occur in the areas defined at the song cycle path and nothing has occurred to diminish this significance.”
“The ACMC is a toothless tiger that consistently fails to protect sites, and the Aboriginal Affairs Minister (Peter Collier) should be ashamed.” He said the Aboriginal Heritage Act is only “a thin veneer of protection” further weakened since a review last year.
The Law Bosses Mr Roe and Mr Hunter have separate legal fights in the Courts to protect their Country. Mr Hunter is arguing inadequate environmental approvals which if upheld would mean the whole Environmental Protection Authority approval process would have to start from scratch.
If Mr Roe’s court battle is won by him then there may well arise the cause for the Native Title claim to the site to be heard before any works commence.
A score of ANZ Banking Group machines sprawled across six capital cities were plastered with "out of order" signs on Sunday after campaigners launched their latest bid to draw attention to the bank's funding of the coal industry.
http://climatecommission.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/CC_Jan_2013_Heatwave4.pdf
The most recent Jan 2013 Climate Commission’s report lists what it says are four key messages for Australians arising from the heatwave. They are:1. The length, extent and severity of the current Australian heatwave is unprecedented.
2. Although Australia has always had heatwaves, hot days and bushfires, climate change is increasing the risk of more frequent and longer heatwaves and more extreme hot days, as well as exacerbating bushfire conditions.
3. Climate change has contributed to making the current extreme heat conditions and bushfires worse.
4. Good community understanding of climate change risks is critical to ensuring appropriate action is taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to put measures in place to prepare for, and to respond to, extreme weather.
The Minister for Indigenous Affairs has granted Section 18 approval to Woodside to disrupt Aboriginal Heritage sites in the Cultural and spiritual significant sanddunes of James Price Point (Walmandy) According to the Minister the Songline is NOT A SITE.
Thats right, the Songline is not a Site it is made up made up of numerous sites: ceremonial, skeletal material/burial, artifacts and middens.
Woodside have actually applied for two Section 18. The first application that was approved was heard at the November Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee meeting. Another Section 18 application was advertised on the 19 of December and is scheduled to be heard at the ACMC meeting on the 13 of February 2013
The Minister for Indigenous Affairs has granted Section 18 approval to Woodside to disrupt Aboriginal Heritage sites in the Cultural and spiritual significant sanddunes of James Price Point (Walmandy) According to the Minister the Songline is NOT A SITE. That right, the Songline is not a Site it is made up made up of numerous sites: ceremonial, skeletal material/burial, artifacts and middens.
Woodside have actually applied for two Section 18. The first application that was approved was heard at the November Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee meeting. Another Section 18 application was advertised on the 19 of December and is scheduled to be heard at the ACMC meeting on the 13 of February 2013
Not every summer will be hotter than the one before. In fact this year is markedly hotter than the last couple of years when we had relatively milder and wetter conditions.
But what we are going to find on average is more of the hot extremes and faster increases in the future, over the next 10 and 30 years, that we have seen over the last 30 years - more hot extremes, more heatwaves and more extreme fire conditions.
Climate scientists have been talking about these increases for more than 20 years in Australia. We are now seeing exactly what was predicted more than 20 years ago.
Professor David Karoly
Miranda Devine’s columns defending violence against environmentalists set a new low for the editorial standards on the opinion pages of the Daily Telegraph and the Sydney Morning Herald. While media publishers such as Rupert Murdoch’s News Limited and Fairfax Media rightfully complain against the victimisation of journalists by vindicative governments or vigilantes, their willingness to defend or potentially incite harassment of environmentalists exposes how shallow their commitment is to ensuring debate over issues is kept within acceptable bounds.
It is, for example, hard to believe that a column defending or advocating violence against journalists would get a run in either the Daily Telegraph or the Sydney Morning Herald. Imagine the outcry if Devine had written that, after a bashing of a journalist, that “violence has its place”. Or the fury of the journalists union if she had written that “it is not arsonists who should be hanging from lamp-posts but journalists”.
But it seems that for the sake of creating controversy to sell newspapers, Devine’s toxic views defending and potentially inciting violence against environmentalists are tolerated.
http://www.tasmaniantimes.com/index.php/article/miranda-devine-and-thuggery
Australia emits 19 tonnes of carbon dioxide a year for each person who lives here. If the world wants to avoid more than 2C of warming the global average must be below three tonnes a year per person. Our addiction to economic growth is now a clear and serious threat to our long-term future.
Pitt & Sherry economist Phil Harrington, a Hobart-based specialist in climate mitigation and adaptation, discovered how serious when he looked into emissions from the proposed new "clean, green" liquefied natural gas hub at James Price Point, Western Australia.
The WA Government says the gigantic plant will release somewhere between 12 and 39 million tonnes of greenhouse gas a year. Calculations of negative impacts by proponents and their supporters usually prove conservative in practice. The upper limit is probably close to the mark.
Based on this supposition, Harrington did his own sums and came up with the number of rooftop solar systems needed to offset emissions from this single industrial undertaking.
The answer is wait for it 20 million. As Harrington says, it's a pity there are only around eight million households in Australia.
pb@climatetasmania.com.au
“More frequent extreme weather events, economic growth, urbanisation and population shifts towards high-risk areas have all combined to dramatically increase Australia's risk exposure,” Suncorp said in the report. “The chance that natural hazard will become natural disaster is greater than ever.”
http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/live-chat-with-premier-colin-barnett/story-e6frg12c-1226460108161
Although the benefits of the new procedure is yet to be formally assessed, anecdotal evidence suggests it is working. The requirement to have trial counsel involved in the case early has generated sufficient consideration of the case so as to result in settlements in some cases, or streamlined preparation for trial in others.
The WA Supreme Court has been asked to overturn the state government's second attempt at compulsory acquisition of the site and rule the $1.5bn compensation deal negotiated with the Kimberley Land Council invalid.
The action alleges the government facilitated an abuse of the federal court process in its dealings over James Price Point.
The Supreme Court action, on behalf of traditional law boss, Phillip Roe, claims the KLC had been placed under "improper pressure" by the WA government when it threatened the KLC and the applicant of the native title claim over the area if the group proceeded with a court action to split the claim.
The KLC was acting following a vote of Goolarabooloo and Jabirr Jabirr people that the native title claim be split.
The new action alleges the state government's actions had been an abuse of the acquisition processes as well as the Federal Court's claim process.
A summons has been lodged in the WA Supreme court against the State of Western Australia, WA Minister for Land, WA Land Corporation, Broome Port Authority, the Kimberley Land Council and others.
In a statement, Mr Barnett said: "The agreement reached by a vote of traditional owners was in accordance with the Commonwealth Native Title process under the supervision of the Federal Court. The state government is confident it has acted in accordance with this process and that the second Notice of Intention to Take was valid," Mr Barnett said.
Woodside?s Browse LNG project would need oil prices to average more than $US105 a barrel to make an economic return in its current format, strengthening the argument for it to be developed as a floating venture.
Broome to be Inpex supply hub |
TOLL Mermaid Logistics Broome, a 50%-owned subsidiary of Mermaid Marine, has won a five-year, $20 million contract to provide supply base services to Inpex in Broome, Western Australia. Under the contract TMLB will develop dedicated infrastructure and provide various services at its Broome supply base to support Inpex’s Ichthys LNG project development drilling works. |
"All the feedback we get is this project won't happen," he said.
"The major cause of that is the Premier interfering and intervening and creating a business environment which is not friendly and that's the outcome, that major investors will pull out."
Nationals Leader Brendon Grylls has described the Pilbara as a “basket case” because of government failures to plan for its growth, leaving its 50,000 residents to live with a raw deal.
"It wasn’t planned and then the community has had to put up with what they’ve got and struggle with it,” Mr Grylls said.
I’ve had more people cry in meetings with me in the Pilbara in the past 12 months than I’ve ever had in my full political career. And they’re crying because of the failure of government.
“They’re crying because having rents of $2000 a week when you’re a small business owner means you’re probably going to lose your business because you can’t afford employees.
Labor MLA for Pilbara Tom Stephens, who will retire at the election, said the speech was an admission of failure and instead of contesting the seat Mr Grylls should resign.“He’s been in the driving seat for four-plus years, with a policy commitment to fix it,” Mr Stephens said.
“He’s blaming everyone for their failures, but he’s a senior Government minister with direct responsibility for land release and regional development.
“He’s become part of the problem, not part of the solution.”
The West Australian Premier has upped the ante on the controversial Browse gas project, indicating that joint venture leader Woodside Petroleum might not receive state government approval for a floating option.
Colin Barnett said he doubted that the cost of constructing his favoured onshore gas processing plant at James Price Point, near Broome, could blow out to between $60 billion and $70 billion, causing Woodside to deem the project uneconomic.
At the stroke of a pen Minister for the Environment, Marmion has allowed a staggering 5.5 million tonnes of additional carbon pollution every year for the life of this project – roughly equal to the pollution from an extra 400,000 Australian households.
The EPA recommended a number of requirements for the gas hub to reduce carbon pollution in order to meet Premier Barnett’s commitment to world’s best practice; however Minister Marmion has overturned the advice of the EPA as well as the Appeals Convener in order to reduce costs for Woodside.
http://ccwa.org.au/media/wa-minister-allows-lng-pollution-blowout-equal-400000-homes
THE National Native Title Tribunal has admitted a senior executive failed to declare her ownership of a consulting firm that facilitated access to Aboriginal land by mining companies.
Nor did the NNTT’s former West Australian state manager, Lillian Maher, declare her relationship with two employees of Fortescue Metals Group, which benefited from tribunal decisions.
Given the rapid growth of reliance on non-resident workers in the resources sector carries significant impacts for individual workers and their families and host communities, as evidenced by the many submissions to the Australian Parliament House inquiry into FIFO/DIDO work practices, chaired by the Independent MP Tony Windsor. Some of the significant impacts include:
These impacts undermine the long-term sustainable community development of Australia. It is troubling therefore that dramatic socio-demographic processes have been unleashed by this boom without concerted attempts to accurately research, measure or account for the numbers of non-resident workers involved and their nation-changing impact on the Australian society and economy.
Within days of the latest court action being lodged, Woodside stopped work at James Price Point, removed all of its machinery and buildings and placed "revegetation site" signs around the area. The company said the site had been prepared for the coming cyclone season but there was still work to do this year.
The Supreme Court current action, on behalf of traditional law boss, Phillip Roe, claims the KLC had been placed under "improper pressure" by the WA government when it threatened the KLC and the applicant of the native title claim over the area if the group proceeded with a court action to split the claim.
The KLC was acting following a vote of Goolarabooloo and Jabirr Jabirr people that the native title claim be split.
Keeping the joint Goolarabooloo Jabirr Jabirr native title claim intact allowed the government to complete a second attempt at compulsory acquisition of the site without having to deal with opponents of the hub.
A first attempt at compulsory acquisition was overturned when the court ruled the state had not adequately identified the area to be acquired.
The Intertidal zone on the west side of the Damiper Peninsula is National Heritage Listed because of the dinosaur track sites embedded in the Broome sand-stone.
However, the National Heritage Council has done nothing to uphold their oblations under the National Heritage management principles (Schedule 5B, EPBC Regulations) for the protection of these important Australian heritage treasures.
Basically, the National Heritage Council has really only drawn a red line on a map and to this day no independently produced map indicating the true boundaries of the intertidal zone, and or the heritage protection areas.
· The objective in managing National Heritage places is to identify, protect, conserve, present and transmit, to all generations, their National Heritage values.
· The management of National Heritage places should:
- Use the best available knowledge, skills and standards for those places, and including ongoing technical and community input to decisions and actions that may have a significant impact on their National Heritage values;
- Respect all heritage values of the place and seek to integrate, where appropriate, any Commonwealth, State, Territory and local government responsibilities for those places;
- Ensure that their use and presentation is consistent with the conservation of their National Heritage values;
- Make timely and appropriate provision for community involvement, especially by people who have a particular interest in, or association with, the place and may be affected by the management of the place;
- Provide for regular monitoring, review and reporting on the conservation of National Heritage values
NONE OF THIS HAS, IS OR EVER WILL BE
UNDERTAKEN, WHY?
Woodside Petroleum (ASX: WPL) has confirmed that is bidding on the oil and gas rights to an enormous undersea gas field off Israel’s coast.
Woodside Petroleum (ASX: WPL) is taking a 40% stake in a deep water oil and gas exploration block offshore Myanmar from South Korea’s Daewoo international Corporation.
Woodside has joined with partners keen on an exploration licence offshore Cyprus.
You would think that Woodside has enough on its plate already, with its Pluto LNG plant stuck in first gear, after the company was unable to find enough gas to support an expansion.
Woodside also has plans to develop two additional – and controversial – LNG plants, namely Browse and Sunrise. Browse is facing opposition from all levels of main stream society. An LNG processing facilities will do untold damage to the environment and national Cultural heritage values at James Price Point and the Broome community, the Austrlian people are becoming more aware of the issue and the campaign.
Its partners in Browse, including BHP Billiton (ASX: BHP), Shell, MIMI and BP, are clearly all in favor for the gas piped to existing processing plant, or on to a floating one, rather than building a greenfield site at James Price Point.
Sunrise has its own issues. East Timor wants an LNG processing plant built in East Timor, with gas piped to it from the Sunrise gas field, while Woodside has said it prefers a floating processing plant.
A final investment decision by the Woodside-led joint venture on a controversial $40bn development of the Browse LNG project south of James Price Point is due next year.
Tender bids for infrastructure were received in the June quarter and Woodside said a "disciplined assurance process is progressing to determine project costs and economics".
A go-ahead decision has already been delayed from this year and analysts suspect the new date of mid-2013 could also be missed.
JAMES PRICE POINT — REGISTERED ABORIGINAL SITES — TERREX REPORT
I refer to Aboriginal sites at James Price Point.
(1) Is the minister aware of the 1991 WA Museum report prepared by Mr Nicholas Green, then a senior heritage officer with the Western Australian Register of Aboriginal Sites, for the Broome Mining Wardens Court in relation to exploration licences E04/645, EO4/646 and EO4/647, which generally is referred to as the Terrex report?
(2) Is the minister aware of the decision of the Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee communicated to the Mining Wardens Court in the above case by letter dated 18 July 1991?
(3) Is the “song cycle path” as recorded and mapped in the above report and as referred to in the ACMC decision, an area to which section 5 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 applies?
(4) Is approval under section 18 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 required in relation to any disturbance of the “song cycle path”?
Hon PETER COLLIER replied:
I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question.
(1) Yes.
(2) Yes; I am aware that the Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee provided advice to the Mining Wardens Court in 1991.
(3) Not at this time; however, the ACMC will be considering heritage information for the area at a meeting in the near feature, and will make a decision about whether a site exists.
(4) No.
Department Indigenous Affairs (DIA) prepared a document for Department State Development (DSD) in January 2009 which stated that:- “The following information has been prepared in response to a request from the Department of State Development for Aboriginal heritage sites registered with the Department of indigenous Affairs along a 10km investigation corridor in the vicinity of James Price Point'. An answer received today now states that DIA has no record of a formal request being received by DIA.
Yet the document exists and is available at http://www.robinchapple.com/sites/default/files/2009-01-12%20DIA%20File%20Note%20to%20DSD.pdf of which the attached email states that this is the brief that was sent some time ago.
This document requested by DSD of which the department has no record of the request was requested in 2009 and would have provided to DSD the advice that the area of James Price Point had significant heritage areas before DSD or the EPA made any assessment of the area as part of the Strategic Assessment Report that was released as Report 1444 in July 2012.
Who we are:
We are a coalition of concerned community members dedicated to stopping the proposed industrial development at James Price Point (Walmadany), north of Broome. We love Broome, its heritage, its culture, its environment and its unique and historically successful multicultural community. We are campaigning against industrialisation because we believe it threatens to destroy all the things we love about our town, our region and our community. There are alternatives to building an LNG plant at James Price Point. We support development of our region that is socially, culturally and environmentally sustainable, and that provides real long-term economic and environmental solutions for current and future generations.
Last month in a disingenuous attempt to circumvent and appease increasing community revolt, both locally and internationally, WA Today’s Rania Spooner wrote that the Premier had announced a Bill
‘…to limit the use of the precinct to gas processing only, to rehabilitate and remediate the land after the precinct is closed and to return the land to traditional owners at the end of the precinct life.’
MEDIA RELEASE
Poll: 85% want Federal Government to make the final decisions on environmentally risky development proposals
Polling released today shows 85 per cent of Australians agree the Federal Government should be able to block or make changes to major projects that could damage the environment.
The Federal Government could give up much of its power to do so under proposed changes to the national Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act, currently being pushed by state governments.
“This is a clear message that Australians want our Federal Government to retain the right to stop potentially damaging developments,” said WWF Conservation Director, Gilly Llewellyn, speaking on behalf of an alliance of more than 30 Australian environment groups.
“It’s obvious that Australians want our unique wildlife and places to have robust protection, that’s why these changes to our national environmental law will not be widely supported,” Dr. Llewellyn said.
Post-Pluto, Woodside's future remains greatly influenced by the high-cost construction environment. By the second quarter of next year, (rumors have it end of this year) Woodside and its partners in the Browse LNG project have to be in a position to make a final investment decision on the contentious development, in line with permit retention conditions imposed by the Federal and WA governments.
Right now Woodside is digesting tenders for the on and offshore components of a project analysts expect to cost at least $40 billion.
The Don to bat on for Nexus
Wednesday, 26 September 2012
EX-WOODSIDE chief Don Voelte is back in the Australian petroleum industry, taking on the role of non-executive chairman at Nexus Energy as part of a major board shake-up.
Current non-executive chairman Michael Fowler and directors Michael Arnett, Steve Lowden and Ian Boserio will all depart Nexus next month.
MP makes conflict of interest claim
Kim Kirkman
Broome Advertiser
A DEPARTMENT of Indigenous Affairs deputy director who was involved in giving advice to Woodside in relation to possible Aboriginal heritage sites at James Price Point was a former director of the Department of State Development's Browse LNG project and received gifts from the oil and gas producer, State Parliament has been told.
In a parliamentary motion last week, Greens MLC Robin Chapple claimed Duncan Ord was one of three Department of Indigenous Affairs employees who had a significant role to play in the development of the (Browse LNG) proposal while working for the DSD.
The motion condemned the Government's "failure to ensure that environmental, indigenous and cultural interests were protected".
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8530514
The approval process for a $34 billion gas hub earmarked for Western Australia carries the "stench of corruption", the Senate has been told.
Woodside Petroleum is seeking environmental approval to build a liquefied natural gas (LNG) processing hub at James Price Point near Broome, amid strong opposition from local indigenous and environmental groups.
During Senate question time on Monday, Australian Greens senator Christine Milne asked the government if it had confidence in the WA assessment process.
She cited weekend media reports, which said Woodside had pressured the state government to withdraw advice about breaches of Aboriginal heritage laws.
Labor frontbencher Stephen Conroy, representing Environment Minister Tony Burke, said Mr Burke would not be making any decision at the federal level until all the state issues were appropriately investigated.
He said he would seek further information from the minister.
When, how and who will investigate this stench of corruption?
Mr Barnett, talking to ABC radio in Perth on Wednesday, agreed it was "coincidental" that Environment Minister Bill Marmion had changed the law last year to allow just one member of the EPA to make decisions - which later happened in the Woodside case.
However, the premier said "there was nothing wrong with the decision".
WA Premier Barnett:
“The reason we’re pushing ahead with James Price Point is not from some political standpoint that we’re right and everyone else is wrong- there is logic in our madness. It’s an informed gut feeling that the Browse basin will be home to not one but possibly two or three projects”, Wednesday, 29 August 2012, Energy News Premium.
“It’s not a private decision – it’s a government decision”, Broome Advertiser, Aug 30, 2012.
On ABC Radio this morning Campbell said himself and Poelina had asked them if the mud would be used for fracking and they were told "no".The mud plant was to supply offshore rigs and Schlumberger did not supply the fracking industry in WA.
ReplyDeleteHowever when pressed on the Shires position on fracking he spat the dummy and told the interviewer the ABC bias was showing again and he had already received an apology over a previous interview - why not talk about this or that suicide etc.?
He then said rejoice because the mud plant would contribute over $100,000 toward public art.
Also "being quite blunt" the boating facility was cancelled because "Barnett had got himself a bloody nose" from previous dealings with Broome and "doing business in Broome" was seen to be too hard by some.
So having the project cancelled in that way was some payback for JPP being too expensive - hardly Broomes fault.
After all when questioned early on in the JPP saga - "had he ever been to JPP?" Barnett said "I flew over it once."
And Voelte once admitted he (Woodside) had no idea having good relations with Aboriginals was important.
But the ego maniac has to blame someone else for his failures of course.
The fact that the mud plant at that site would be an abominable eyesore was not raised.
Its true you cannot frack with mud but you can drill very very deep holes, that you can then pour vast amounts of chemicals down and other devices that can do the fracking. They want to build this on the pinan foreshore on ®roebuck Bay. Gampbell has very little understanding about fracking he is just trying really hard to stay in good with the telly toddies gang. Red
DeleteHaha - I like that "the telly toddies gang".
DeleteHow much of the wasted $8 million JPP money went into their pockets?
The "oil and gas consultancy" must have been charging SERCO rates - just like their poofy mate and the $4 million to find Chinatown.
One thing for sure a fracking crew will be easy to spot.
Heres a couple of articles on mud and onshore/offshore fracking.
How Do Drilling Fluids Work?
DeleteDrilling deeper, longer and more challenging wells has been made possible by improvements in drilling technologies, including more efficient and effective drilling fluids. Drilling fluids, also referred to as drilling mud, are added to the wellbore to facilitate the drilling process by suspending cuttings, controlling pressure, stabilizing exposed rock, providing buoyancy, and cooling and lubricating.
As early as the third century BC, the Chinese were using drilling fluids, in the form of water, to help permeate the ground when drilling for hydrocarbons. The term "mud" was coined when at Spindletop in the US, drillers ran a herd of cattle through a watered-down field and used the resulting mud to lubricate the drill.
While the technology and chemistry of drilling fluids have become much more complex, the concept has remained the same. Drilling fluids are essential to drilling success, both maximizing recovery and minimizing the amount of time it takes to achieve first oil.
Purposes of Drilling Fluid
During drilling, cuttings are obviously created, but they do not usually pose a problem until drilling stops because a drillbit requires replacement or another problem. When this happens, and drilling fluids are not used, the cuttings then fill the hole again. Drilling fluids are used as a suspension tool to keep this from happening. The viscosity of the drilling fluid increases when movement decreases, allowing the fluid to have a liquid consistency when drilling is occurring and then turn into a more solid substance when drilling has stopped. Cuttings are then suspended in the well until the drill is again inserted. This gel-like substance then transforms again into a liquid when drilling starts back up.
Drilling fluids also help to control pressure in a well by offsetting the pressure of the hydrocarbons and the rock formations. Weighing agents are added to the drilling fluids to increase its density and, therefore, its pressure on the walls of the well.
Another important function of drilling fluids is rock stabilization. Special additives are used to ensure that the drilling fluid is not absorbed by the rock formation in the well and that the pores of the rock formation are not clogged.
The longer the well, the more drill pipe is needed to drill the well. This amount of drill pipe gets heavy, and the drilling fluid adds buoyancy, reducing stress. Additionally, drilling fluid helps to reduce friction with the rock formation, reducing heat. This lubrication and cooling helps to prolong the life of the drillbit.
Types of Drilling Fluids
Drilling fluids are water-, oil- or synthetic-based, and each composition provides different solutions in the well. If rock formation is composed of salt or clay, proper action must be taken for the drilling fluids to be effective. In fact, a drilling fluid engineer oversees the drilling, adding drilling fluid additives throughout the process to achieve more buoyancy or minimize friction, whatever the need may be.
In addition to considering the chemical composition and properties of the well, a drilling fluid engineer must also take environmental impact into account when prescribing the type of drilling fluid necessary in a well. Oil-based drilling fluids may work better with a saltier rock. Water-based drilling fluids are generally considered to affect the environment less during offshore drilling.
Disposal of drilling fluids after they are used can also be a challenge. Recent technological advances have established methods for recycling drilling fluids.
Fracking 101: Breaking down the most important part of today’s oil, gas drilling
Deletehttp://www.greeleytribune.com/news/9558384-113/drilling-oil-equipment-wellbore
Glossary of terms
» Blender: The equipment used to prepare the slurries and gels commonly used in stimulation treatments. Modern blenders are computer controlled, enabling the flow of chemicals and ingredients to be efficiently metered and requiring a relatively small residence volume to achieve good control over the blend quality and delivery rate.
» Casing: Steel pipe cemented in place during the construction process to stabilize the wellbore. The casing forms a major structural component of the wellbore and serves several important functions: preventing the formation wall from caving into the wellbore, isolating the different formations to prevent the flow or crossflow of formation fluid, and providing a means of maintaining control of formation fluids and pressure as the well is drilled. The casing string provides a means of securing surface pressure control equipment and downhole production equipment, such as the drilling blowout preventer (BOP) or production packer. Casing is available in a range of sizes and material grades.
» Completion: A generic term used to describe the events and equipment necessary to bring a wellbore into production once drilling operations have been concluded, including but not limited to the assembly of downhole tubulars and equipment required to enable safe and efficient production from an oil or gas well. Completion quality can significantly affect production from shale reservoirs.
» Drilling rig: The machine used to drill a wellbore. It includes virtually everything except living quarters. Major components of the rig include the mud tanks, the mud pumps, the derrick or mast, the drawworks, the rotary table or topdrive, the drillstring, the power generation equipment and auxiliary equipment.
» Hydration unit: This unit mixes the water and chemical additives to make the frac fluid. Usually the blending process takes a few minutes for the water to gel to the right consistency.
» Missile: The missile is comprised of a low-pressure side and a high pressure side, and is the manifold through which the frac fluid flows to the pressurization trucks, and into the wellbore to frac the rock.
» Roughneck: A floor hand, or member of the drilling crew, who works under the direction of the driller to make or break connections as drillpipe is tripped in or out of the hole. On most drilling rigs, roughnecks are also responsible for maintaining and repairing much of the equipment found on the drill floor and derrick.
» Roustabout: Any unskilled manual laborer on the rigsite. Roustabouts are commonly hired to ensure that the skilled personnel that run an expensive drilling rig are not distracted by peripheral tasks, ranging from cleaning up the location to cleaning threads to digging trenches to scraping and painting rig components.
» Shale: A fine-grained sedimentary rock formed by consolidation of clay- and silt-sized particles into thin, relatively impermeable layers. It is the most abundant sedimentary rock. Shale can include relatively large amounts of organic material compared with other rock types and thus has potential to become a rich hydrocarbon source rock, even though a typical shale contains just 1 percent organic matter.
» Tank battery: A group of tanks that are connected to receive crude oil production from a well or a producing lease. A tank battery is also called a battery. In the tank battery, the oil volume is measured and tested before pumping the oil into the pipeline system.
» Wellbore: The drilled hole or borehole, including the openhole or uncased portion of the well. Borehole may refer to the inside diameter of the wellbore wall, the rock face that bounds the drilled hole.
Glossary of terms
Delete» Vapor Recovery Unit: A system at a drilling site to recover vapors formed inside completely sealed crude oil or condensate tanks. The vapors are sucked through a scrubber, where the liquid trapped is returned to the liquid pipeline system or to the tanks, and the vapor recovered is pumped into gas lines.
Source: Tribune research and Schlumberger, a global supplier of oil field technology and equipment
Fracking 101: Breaking down the most important part of today’s oil, gas drilling
Deletehttp://www.greeleytribune.com/news/9558384-113/drilling-oil-equipment-wellbore
Starting a well
Companies start the drilling process on about a 3-acre pad of land, which allows for the many trucks that become part of an oil and gas drilling process.
The process begins with vertical drilling. A drilling rig is brought on site to drill the well, which will go to depths of up to 10,000 feet below the surface. This process can take from a week to 10 days, depending on the site.
Drilling stops initially below the water table so the well can be encased in cement to prevent anything from the well leaking into the water table. Once the casing is completed, a 7-inch drill bit will drill more than a mile to get to the formation in which to frac, usually the Niobrara or Codell formations, both stacked beneath several impermeable rock formations. Once the drill bit hits bottom, or the “pay zone,” the company will drill what is called the “bend,” which is the curve the well takes to get into the horizontal portion of the zone. The bend alone could take up to two days to drill.
Throughout the drilling process, drilling mud is pumped in to cool the drill bit and act as a means for the resulting debris to leave the well.
The horizontal portion of the well then is drilled for an additional 4,000 feet to 10,000 feet, then encased in cement, with a 4-inch metal pipe in the center to allow for the oil and gas to flow to the surface. At this point, the well is just a hole drilled into the ground, with a cement barrier between the pipe, the formations and water table.
The rig is packed up and activity stops until fracking is scheduled. Sometimes it can wait for weeks before a fracking crew is able to get there. Sometimes it takes a couple of days.
Fracking 101
DeleteFracking
The actual fracking process uses a lot of machinery capable of driving the fluid down more than a mile, and a lot of science to calculate the exact mixtures of everything from chemicals and water and sand to the pressure it takes to crack tiny little fissures into rocks, more than a mile beneath the surface.
Sand, water and chemical additives are pumped into the well at high pressures, so as to crack the rock in different stages in the horizontal (parallel to the surface) portion of the well.
“To open fractures at bottom-hole pressures in the Niobrara, you probably need downhole pressures of 10,000 psi or so to open the rocks,” Weijers said.
The chemicals do not erode the rock to create the cracks or fracs — it’s the high pressure of the water that opens them up. The chemicals, such as guar gum, which also are in many foods we eat, are added to help the water to gel, allowing the sand an easier vehicle in which to move.
“When it’s thicker, it does a better job of carrying sand downhole,” Weijers said. “If you think about a handful of sand at a lake, and you put it in water, the sand will settle quickly to the bottom of the lake. We don’t want that to happen in factures.”
Those cracks, now held open by the tiny kernels of sand, release the trapped oil and gas inside, which flow back to the surface after the downward pressure from fluids is released from the well.
Soap ingredients also can be added to the gel to prevent bacterial growth in the well. If bacteria forms, it could release deadly gases.
“You put a lot worse stuff in your food, your yard, or your garden,” Richardson said. “A lot of the chemicals are used to clean your counters, and put in your make-up.”
Many involved in the process describe frac fluid as “slime,” like the stuff kids play with from the local toy store.
Fracking 101
DeleteThe Layout
To handle the sand, water, chemicals and production that comes out of the well during the fracking of the well (commonly called flowback), the site needs have the basics: Trucks, trucks and more trucks to carry the water, the sand, and the chemicals to mix them all together, and more truck horsepower to combine it all to shoot down through a pipe into an 8-inch hole in the ground.
To prep the area, several 500-barrel tanks for water storage or a massive, 40,000-barrel pool to store water is erected on the periphery of the site. Sand storage tanks arrive, then are filled. A typical frac job will utilize from 1.5 million to 6 million pounds of sand.
Iron trucks carry massive amounts of pipe that will be used to keep the well opened and separate from the well.
“When the rest of the crew arrives on location, they’ll typically rig up to the well head with a missile,” Weijers said.
The missile is a manifold around which most of the activity centers, to ultimately pump fracking fluid downhole. Crews will line on each side of the missile five to six semi trucks, which contain the horsepower to create enough pressure to pump the fluid downhole at the proper rate.
In addition to the horsepower trucks, there are sand trucks and trucks containing the chemical additives to thicken the water to keep the sand moving in the well.
A hydration truck, through which the chemicals are added to the water to “gel,” and a blender, which mixes that fluid with the sand, are nearby. All surround the missile in a horseshoe shape.
“The blender sends the mixture of sand water to the low-pressure side of the missile,” Weijers said. “From that missile, we have 10-12 connections to the individual horsepower units, which really pressurize the mixture of sand and fluids so the (missile) can send it (through its high-pressure side) downhole at pressures that can crack the rock open.”
That one process is good for one frac, or stage, at which the horizontal well is cracked from being hit at such high pressures.
A typical well can have 20 fracs, each necessitating this procedure of blending, pressurizing and cracking. A typical frac job can last up to 20 hours — one frac stage per hour — from start to finish.
At the open end, or the top of the horseshoe, is a data center, or a trailer containing about five to six people controlling the science of the job. There’s usually a representative or two from the oil and gas company, a frac job supervisor and an engineer to do the calculations.
“Typically, there’s an engineer who makes the readings of the pressure,” Weijers said. “There’s hundreds of parameters being tracked, all the chemicals, the proppant (sand) being pumped, pressures during the job. The engineer makes it possible to track that and do scientific calculations of the data.”
Here, employees track every aspect of the job, from pressures of the frac fluid to the diesel engine’s fuel gauges.
At various other open areas, there will be containers in which the used sand and production waters are placed into once they fulfill their purpose in the wells to be hauled off later for recycling, injection or disposal.
On jobs where crews utilize a large pool of water, the water is usually being heated to temperatures of about 70 degrees to provide the perfect chemical combination with the additives and sand.
At some point in the drilling and completion process, crews will build oil and gas storage tanks, vapor recovery units to control air emissions, and oil and gas separators for the eventual well production. All will be strategically located around the wellhead.
Fracking 101
DeleteCompletion
Once all the fracs are created, the downward pressure is removed from the well. Within a couple of days, the release of that pressure will reverse, allowing the oil and gas to flow from the rocks and up the well.
“At end of the frac job, the flow stream is reversed,” Wiejers said. “Instead of pumping things downhole, due to the pressure we created, we have almost no pressure at the surface, then the flow reverts and oil and gas and some of the water find their way back from downhole to the surface.”
All the equipment is removed from the site, leaving only the wellhead, the storage tanks, separators and emissions control. Production can last for years.
OFFSHORE
DeleteBaker Hughes Incorporated, announced that its subsidiary has chartered a new state-of-the-art pressure pumping vessel that will provide offshore stimulation services to Maersk Oil in the North Sea. Upon completion, scheduled for late 2013, the Blue Orca(TM) will become the eighth vessel in the Baker Hughes fleet.
“We are pleased to be working with Maersk Oil as we expand our current fleet into the North Sea,” said Art Soucy, Baker Hughes’ President of Global Products & Services. “Our full cadre of world-class stimulation vessels offers customers the capacity, performance and redundancy for round-the-clock operations that are needed in today’s offshore plays. We are committed to operating safely and efficiently while continuing to build on our pressure pumping market leadership and the challenging offshore environments where operators need us to be.”
The Blue Orca will be rated to 15,000 psi and will offer among the largest fluid and proppant carrying capacities in the world. It will provide 15,000 hydraulic horsepower pumping capacity and the ability to pump at rates well in excess of 60 bpm. Engineering work on the marine and stimulation systems has already begun.
“Stimulation of long horizontal wells is one of Maersk Oil’s key technologies and vital for economic development of our tight chalk reservoirs,” said Mary Van Domelen, Maersk Oil’s Stimulation Team Leader. “We appreciate the opportunity to work with Baker Hughes to deliver a new state-of-the-art stimulation vessel and look forward to welcoming the Blue Orca to the North Sea.”
The Blue Orca will join Baker Hughes’ other stimulation vessels – including the company’s newest additions to the Gulf of Mexico: Blue Tarpon and the Blue Dolphin. The vessels support offshore completion operations and will be equipped to support high-rate and high-volume multi-zone fracturing operations.
“Our pressure pumping vessels offer enhanced safety systems with redundant back-up blending and pumping capabilities,” said Lindsay Link, Baker Hughes’ President of Pressure Pumping. “When it comes to performing multi-zone, high-rate, high-pressure completions, our vessels are reliable, efficient and minimize delays in high-cost offshore environments, where time is of the essence for the operators on behalf of whom we are working.”
FATE AND BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF OIL WELL DRILLING FLUIDS ON THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT
Deletehttp://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/9100A6ZX.txt?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=1981%20Thru%201985&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&UseQField=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5CZYFILES%5CINDEX%20DATA%5C81THRU85%5CTXT%5C00000016%5C9100A6ZX.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anonymous&SortMethod=h%7C-&MaximumDocuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&Display=p%7Cf&DefSeekPage=x&SearchBack=ZyActionL&Back=ZyActionS&BackDesc=Results%20page&MaximumPages=1&ZyEntry=1
..................................................
Impacts of Offshore Drilling
http://oceana.org/en/our-work/stop-ocean-pollution/oil-pollution/learn-act/impacts-of-offshore-drilling
Offshore drilling operations create various forms of pollution that have considerable negative effects on marine and other wildlife.
These include drilling muds, brine wastes, deck runoff water and flowline and pipeline leaks. Catastrophic spills and blowouts are also a threat from offshore drilling operations. These operations also pose a threat to human health, especially to oil platform workers themselves.
Drilling muds and produced water are disposed of daily by offshore rigs. Offshore rigs can dump tons of drilling fluid, metal cuttings, including toxic metals, such as lead chromium and mercury, as well as carcinogens, such as benzene, into the ocean.
Effects of Drilling Muds
Drilling muds are used for the lubrication and cooling of the drill bit and pipe. The muds also remove the cuttings that come from the bottom of the oil well and help prevent blowouts by acting as a sealant. There are different types of drilling muds used in oil drilling operations, but all release toxic chemicals that can affect marine life. One drilling platform normally drills between seventy and one hundred wells and discharges more than 90,000 metric tons of drilling fluids and metal cuttings into the ocean.
Effects of Produced Water
Produced water is fluid trapped underground and brought up with oil and gas. It makes up about 20 percent of the waste associated with offshore drilling. Produced waters usually have an oil content of 30 to 40 parts per million. As a result, the nearly 2 billion gallons of produced water released into the Cook Inlet in Alaska each year contain about 70,000 gallons of oil.
Effects of Exploration
Factors other than pollutants can affect marine wildlife as well. Exploration for offshore oil involves firing air guns which send a strong shock across the seabed that can decrease fish catch, damage the hearing capacity of various marine species and may lead to marine mammal strandings.
More drilling muds and fluids are discharged into the ocean during exploratory drilling than in developmental drilling because exploratory wells are generally deeper, drilled slower and are larger in diameter. The drilling waste, including metal cuttings, from exploratory drilling are generally dumped in the ocean, rather than being brought back up to the platform.
Effects of Offshore Oil Rigs
Offshore oil rigs may also attract seabirds at night due to their lighting and flaring and because fish aggregate near them. Bird mortality has been associated with physical collisions with the rigs, as well as incineration by the flare and oil from leaks. This process of flaring involves the burning off of fossil fuels which produces black carbon.
Black carbon contributes to climate change as it is a potent warmer both in the atmosphere and when deposited on snow and ice. Drilling activity around oil rigs is suspected of contributing to elevated levels of mercury in Gulf of Mexico fish.
http://www.offshore-environment.com/drillwastestream.html
DeleteTerminology and the Obfuscating Euphemism
So - we are not allowed to know what, exactly, is in the waste dumped over the side of thousands of drilling rigs, production platforms and drillships. The terminology used to describe the main classes of drilling fluids can also be confusing because it has changed over the years, to keep up with changes in mud technology. These are the terms used by the Oslo-Paris Commission (OSPAR) and the UK Department of Trade and Industry, as of March 2000:
a. Water-based muds or fluids (WBM);
b. Organic-phase drilling fluids (OPF), which is the newly-coined collective term (and euphemism) for:
i. Oil-based muds (OBM), including Low-toxicity Oil-based Muds (LTOM) and
ii. Synthetic-based drilling fluid/mud (SBF or SBM) - formerly known as Pseudo Oil-based Mud (POBM) and also including Emulsion-based Mud.
As discussed below in more detail, the term WBM conceals the fact that the water base may contain hydrocarbons in concentrations of parts-per-thousand (Reddy, S., et al. 1995. op. cit.), some from additives and some from crude petroleum with which the mud has been in contact down the hole (Patin, S. A. 1999. Environmental Impact of the Offshore Oil & Gas Industry. Eco Monitor Publishing, East Northport, New York. ISBN 0-967 1836-0-X.)
Whatever the base fluid used, nearly all muds contain at least some of the additives in the List of Notified Chemicals and the Fluids Tables mentioned above. These materials come back up the well to the drilling floor (The deck of the drilling rig or platforms where the drilling turntable and drilling crews are located) in a slurry with drill cuttings (rock fragments), crude oil, gas, natural gas liquids, produced water, traces of heavy metals, biocides, surfactants and other, mostly organic, substances. The mixtures entering and leaving a well can be so complicated that the OCNS has a special reporting category called UCMs: "unresolvable complex mixtures" (CEFAS. 2000a. op. cit. p.20). In the early years of offshore drilling, all this material was dumped into the sea.
Pollution problems caused by oil and other contaminants in waste drilling fluids were recognised over 40 years ago in the Gulf of Mexico and, since the development of the North Sea oil and gas fields in the 1970s, have become a major political issue in Western Europe.
Oil-based muds were developed for situations where WBMs could not provide enough lubrication or other desired characteristics. Usually, this would be when a job required directional, or deviated, drilling. In this precision drilling technique, now so essential to the industry, the drill bit can be "steered" downhole so that the well deviates from the vertical by a known and controlled angle.
http://www.offshore-environment.com/drillwastestream.html
DeleteWhen wells are drilled many thousands of feet below the seabed, the drill bit can end up cutting horizontally through the strata, making accessible isolated pockets of oil and gas that were previously not economic to extract. Such deviated drilling has revolutionised the economics of offshore oil and gas drilling and has become standard procedure on such fields as the Atlantic Margin, off the west coast of Shetland, where many small, discrete reservoirs can now be penetrated with a single well. Although the radii of such curved wells are very large, deviated drilling still requires drilling mud with higher lubrication qualities than the ordinary, water-based mud traditionally used for spudding in and drilling vertical wells - particularly when cutting through layers of very hard rock or when drilling smaller radius holes a long way down. Until the mid-1980s, OBM was routinely used for this kind of difficult drilling.
The realisation that relatively large areas of seabed around hundreds of offshore installations had been smothered, sterilised and/or poisoned, by OBM-contaminated drill cuttings and the crude oil sticking to them, led to a number of international agreements which, by 1996, had outlawed the discharge of oil-based drilling muds containing diesel or mineral oils (OSPAR. 1992a. PARCOM Decision 92/2 on the Use of Oil-based Muds. See also: OSPAR. 1996. PARCOM Decision 96/3 on a Harmonized Mandatory Control System for the Use and Reduction of the Discharge of Offshore Chemicals; OSPAR. 1997. PARCOM Decision 97/1 on Substances/Preparations Used and Discharged Offshore; OSPAR. 1999a. List of Substances / Preparations Used and Discharged Offshore Which Are Considered to Pose Little or No Risk to the Environment (PLONOR)). How far this has been put into effect is the subject of some debate.
Low-toxicity OBMs can be and still are used (See the list of "Z-muds" on the CEFAS website: http://www.cefas.co.uk/ocns. Group Z Base Fluids), but only in formulations designed for zero-discharge, where all the used mud is either recycled (usually onshore) or re-injected with cuttings into the rocks below the seabed.
Changing the terminology is a technique sometimes used by industries seeking to delay or weaken regulation. Giving something a new, neutral-sounding name can confuse and soothe lawmakers, government officials and the general public. A classic example of the obfuscating euphemism, originating in the US, is the recent re-naming of drilling muds.
Deletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drilling_fluid
##Water-based mud (WBM): Most basic water-based mud systems begin with water, then clays and other chemicals are incorporated into the water to create a homogenous blend resembling something between chocolate milk and a malt (depending on viscosity). The clay (called "shale" in its rock form) is usually a combination of native clays that are suspended in the fluid while drilling, or specific types of clay that are processed and sold as additives for the WBM system. The most common of these is bentonite, frequently referred to in the oilfield as "gel". Gel likely makes reference to the fact that while the fluid is being pumped, it can be very thin and free-flowing (like chocolate milk), though when pumping is stopped, the static fluid builds a "gel" structure that resists flow. When an adequate pumping force is applied to "break the gel", flow resumes and the fluid returns to its previously free-flowing state. Many other chemicals (e.g. potassium formate) are added to a WBM system to achieve various effects, including: viscosity control, shale stability, enhance drilling rate of penetration, cooling and lubricating of equipment.
##Oil-based mud (OBM): Oil-based mud can be a mud where the base fluid is a petroleum product such as diesel fuel. Oil-based muds are used for many reasons, some being increased lubricity, enhanced shale inhibition, and greater cleaning abilities with less viscosity. Oil-based muds also withstand greater heat without breaking down. The use of oil-based muds has special considerations. These include cost, environmental considerations such as disposal of cuttings in an appropriate place to isolate possible environmental contamination and the exploratory disadvantages of using oil based mud, especially in wildcat wells due inability to analyze oil shows in cuttings, because the oil based mud has fluorescence confusing with the original oil of formation. Therefore induces contamination of cuttings samples, cores, sidewall cores for geochemical analysis of TOC and masks the real determination of API gravity due to this contamination.
##Synthetic-based fluid (SBM) (Otherwise known as Low Toxicity Oil Based Mud or LTOBM): Synthetic-based fluid is a mud where the base fluid is a synthetic oil. This is most often used on offshore rigs because it has the properties of an oil-based mud, but the toxicity of the fluid fumes are much less than an oil-based fluid. This is important when men work with the fluid in an enclosed space such as an offshore drilling rig. The same environmental problems and contamination for analysis of rock samples occurs using Synthetic-based fluid.
On a drilling rig, mud is pumped from the mud pits through the drill string where it sprays out of nozzles on the drill bit, cleaning and cooling the drill bit in the process. The mud then carries the crushed or cut rock ("cuttings") up the annular space ("annulus") between the drill string and the sides of the hole being drilled, up through the surface casing, where it emerges back at the surface. Cuttings are then filtered out with either a shale shaker, or the newer shale conveyor technology, and the mud returns to the mud pits. The mud pits let the drilled "fines" settle; the pits are also where the fluid is treated by adding chemicals and other substances.
Fluid Pit
The returning mud can contain natural gases or other flammable materials which will collect in and around the shale shaker / conveyor area or in other work areas. Because of the risk of a fire or an explosion if they ignite, special monitoring sensors and explosion-proof certified equipment is commonly installed, and workers are advised to take safety precautions. The mud is then pumped back down the hole and further re-circulated. After testing, the mud is treated periodically in the mud pits to ensure properties which optimize and improve drilling efficiency, borehole stability, and other requirements listed below.
http://petrowiki.org/Drilling_fluid_environmental_considerations
DeleteDrilling fluid environmental considerations
Health, safety and environment policies
The health, safety, and environmental (HSE) policies of many companies are more stringent than those required by national governments and the various agencies charged with overseeing drilling operations. All personnel who take part in the well-construction process must comply with these standards to ensure their own safety and that of others. On most locations, a “zero-tolerance” policy is in effect concerning behaviors that might endanger workers, the environment, or the safe progress of the operation. Additionally, all personnel are encouraged to report potentially hazardous activities or circumstances through a variety of observational safety programs.
The packaging, transport, and storage of drilling-fluid additives and/or premixed fluid systems are closely scrutinized regarding HSE issues. Personnel who handle drilling fluid and its components are required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent inhalation or other direct contact with potentially hazardous materials. Risk-assessed ergonomic programs have been established to reduce the potential for injuries related to lifting sacks and other materials, and operating mud-mixing equipment.
Transportation and management
When possible, drilling-fluid additives, base fluids, and whole mud are transported in bulk-tote tanks or are containerized. These transport methods help reduce packaging-related waste, and minimize the risk of harming personnel, polluting the environment, and impairing operations. High-volume materials such as barite, bentonite, salt, and base fluids almost always are provided in bulk to offshore installations. Onshore locations might use both bulk and packaged-unit materials, depending on the well depth and complexity.
The drilling-fluids specialist and operator representative at each location are responsible for ensuring that the available volume and properties of the drilling fluid will meet the immediate demands of a well-control situation, for example:
◾ A loss of circulation
◾ A tripping of a wet string
◾ A material-delivery delay caused by adverse transport conditions
◾ The need to mix additional volumes of drilling fluid with the appropriate properties at the rigsite
◾ The need to obtain additional volumes of drilling fluid with the appropriate properties in a timely manner
Published well-control guidelines recommend storing a riser volume plus 200 bbl (for pumping and line losses) in water depths ≥ 1,000 ft.[1] Many deepwater-drilling operations take place in water depths exceeding this and approaching 10,000 ft. Nonsettling, ballast-storable drilling fluids have been used offshore to eliminate the risk of disruptions to supply created by inclement weather, and to prepare for drilling through SWFzones
Drilling fluid environmental considerations
DeleteSources of contamination
Land and offshore drilling locations are regulated regarding:
◾ Disposal of whole mud
◾ Drilled cuttings and other solids
◾ Runoff generated by rainfall
◾ Wave action
◾ Water used at the rigsite
Industrywide efforts to eliminate environmental hazards resulting from accidents or the negligent handling of drilling fluids and/or drilled cuttings encompass several contamination issues related to drilling fluids:
◾ Formulation (chlorides, base oils, heavy metals, and corrosion inhibitors)
◾ Natural sources (crude oil, salt water, or salt formation)
◾ Rigsite materials (pipe dope, lubricants, and fuel)
In some cases, reformulating drilling-fluid systems makes them environmentally more benign. For example, chrome lignosulfonate water-based fluid (WBF) is available in a chrome-free formulation. The development of SBFs stemmed from the need to replace diesel- and mineral-oil-based fluids (OBFs) because of environmental restrictions.
The discharge of conventional OBFs and drilled cuttings effectively was prohibited in the North Sea in 2000. According to the Convention (OSPAR) Commission for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic, 98% of the total hydrocarbon discharge volume consists of produced water and drilled cuttings generated with SBFs.[6]
Cuttings that are generated by drilling with certain compliant SBFs may be discharged overboard in the western Gulf of Mexico if they comply with the retention-on-cuttings (ROC) limits introduced in 2002 by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Neither traditional OBFs nor the drilled cuttings produced while using them can be discharged in the Gulf of Mexico. The rare offshore operation that uses a diesel- or mineral-based fluid must include a closed-loop process for continuously capturing all drilled cuttings and returning them to shore for regulated disposal.
Buru-Mitsubishi JV Spuds Ungani 3 Appraisal Well in Western Australia
ReplyDeleteAustralia's oil and gas company Buru Energy Limited disclosed that drilling operations on the Ungani 3 well in exploration permit (EP) 391 in Western Australia commenced at 17:30hrs Jan. 14 (AWST) using the Advanced Energy Services Crusader 405 drilling rig. As at 06:00hrs Jan. 15 (AWST) the well was drilling ahead at 337 feet (103 meters). Ungani 3 is the first well in the Buru – Mitsubishi Corporation (MC) 2014 drilling program. Buru and MC each have a 50 percent equity and contributing interest in the well and the Ungani Field.
The Ungani 3 well is located in production application STP-PRA-0004 in EP 391 some 62 miles (100 kilometers) to the east of Broome. The well location is some 31 miles (50 kilometers) from the Great Northern Highway along the Ungani access road. The well has a programmed total depth of 7,677 feet (2,340 meters) and is expected to take some 35 days to drill and suspend.
The well is located in the Ungani Field area on a separate pad to the Ungani Production Facilities (UPF) and is some 3,280 feet (1,000 meters) to the east of the Ungani 1 and 2 wells. The planned production from the well will be transferred to the UPF via a pipeline from the Ungani 3 pad.
The primary objective of the well is the oil producing Ungani Dolomite reservoir of the Ungani Field, the well also has a secondary target in the overlying Grant Formation in which oil shows were encountered in the Ungani 1 well, and where a potentially significant structural closure has been identified on the Ungani 3D seismic data.
Future Activities and
DeleteTechnologies
AEG is committed to working
closely with Western Australian
operators to continuously improve
well construction efficiency; raise
health, safety and environmental
standards; and reduce overall well
construction costs. As our clients
achieve exploration and appraisal
success, their focus will shift
from remote exploration wells to
enhanced efficiency of development
drilling, as well as minimisation
of the environmental impact of
remote operations.
By working closely with its business
partners, AEG will provide enhanced
capabilities that are aligned to our
client’s objectives. These services and
technologies are likely to include:
• Closed-loop drilling fluid management
systems enabling fluid conditioning
and recycling with greatly reduced
environmental impact;
• Directional casing drilling technology
enabling efficient construction of
horizontal development wells,
significantly reducing overall well
construction time and cost;
• Underbalanced drilling capabilities
enabling optimisation of reservoir
performance for development wells
and a reduction in overall well
numbers; and
• New rig (such as the design shown in
Figure 1) which enable extremely
efficient rig moves at multi-well
pads (‘walking rig’) and between
fields and basins.
It is clear that a step-change is
required in the onshore drilling
services sector, a change that will
reduce overall well construction
costs, reduce our environmental
impact and greatly improve the health
and safety of well-site personnel.
AEG believes that these changes
can only be delivered by the
embracing new technologies and
adopting a management philosophy
that enables closer collaboration and
alignment between operators and
service providers.
This will not be an easy change
to realise, however it is crucial to
improving productivity and reducing
overall well construction costs
within the onshore oil and gas
sector. If this can be achieved it
will deliver significant value to
exploration and production
companies, service providers and
the Western Australian community.
http://www.dmp.wa.gov.au/documents/Petroleum_WA_September_2013.pdf
..............
Posted as a guide as to what they are up to in trying to get costs down for CB operations.
How Does a Top Drive Work?
DeleteUsed to rotate the drill string during the drilling process, the top drive is a motor that is suspended from the derrick, or mast, of the rig. These power swivels boast at least 1,000 horsepower that turn a shaft to which the drill string is screwed. Replacing the traditional Kelly or rotary table, the top drive lessens the manual labor involved in drilling, as well as many associated risks.
A top drive is comprised of one or more electric or hydraulic motors, which is connected to the drill string via a short section of pipe known as the quill. Suspended from a hook below the traveling block, the top drive is able to move up and down the derrick. Many times, slips are still employed on a rotary table to ensure the drill string does not fall down the well.
Chosen both for increased safety and efficiency, top drives provide several key benefits:
•A top drive is capable of drilling with three joints stands, instead of just one pipe at a time.
•Top drives typically decrease the frequency of stuck pipe, which contributes to cost savings.
•A top drive allows drillers to more quickly engage and disengage pumps or the rotary while removing or restringing the pipe.
•Top drives are also preferable for challenging extended-reach and directional wells.
Reducing risk and increasing safety during the drilling process, top drives remove much of the manual labor that was previously required to drill wells. Many times, top drives are completely automated, offering rotational control and maximum torque, as well as control over the weight on the bit.
Top drives can be used in all environments and on all types of rigs, from truck-mounted units to the largest offshore rig. Although top drives can be used on both onshore and offshore rigs, there are some differences between the two. For example, on an offshore rig, the top drive travels up and down the vertical rails to avoid the mechanism from swaying with the waves of the ocean.
Drilling With Casing
DeleteWeatherford's drilling-with-casing (DwC™) system eliminates the need to trip pipe and bottomhole assemblies (BHAs), increasing drilling speed and reducing risk exposure by always having casing on or near the bottom. The DwC system simplifies well architecture by potentially reducing the surface casing size as well as contingency casing strings or liners. A casing string or liner can be eliminated by successfully drilling into or through a pressure transition or lost zone.
As reservoirs age, drilling hazards ranging from depleted zones with pressure transitions and hole stability problems become more prevalent. These issues add to an estimated 10 to 20 percent or more to drilling time. Additionally, conventional methods used to control lost circulation such as mud additives, pumping cement plugs, cementing, and resins can be time consuming, costly, and often ineffective.
...............................
Casing Drilling Services
TDDirect technology eliminates dedicated casing runs
TDDirect casing-drilling and liner-drilling technology delivers a high-quality wellbore by casing and isolating the formation while drilling. Each foot of borehole is drilled and cased off simultaneously, eliminating the need for separate casing or liner runs. When TD is reached, the borehole is ready for cementing. Compared with the performance of conventional drilling systems, TDDirect technology has recorded equal or better on-bottom ROPs and has reduced the time spent on drilling and casing operations by more than 30%.
...........................
Canrig Drilling Technology Ltd. Introduces New Casing Running Tool
Magnolia, Texas (April 26, 2010) – Today Canrig Drilling Technology Ltd. launches an automated casing running tool that decreases drilling costs while helping to overcome complex well conditions, all while leaving casing in better condition than traditional die slips. The SureGrip™ CRT was strategically designed to address many of operators’ major concerns, including drilling efficiency, operational safety, pipe condition and equipment integration.
“Our new SureGrip technology does the work of an entire casing crew with the touch of a button from the driller or certified Canrig technician,” said Chris Papouras, President of Canrig. “It allows rig personnel to focus on landing casing down-hole instead of the handling process of getting casing ready to trip in. SureGrip reduces the manual handling, equipment and personnel needed to run casing, resulting in enhanced operating efficiency and drill floor safety.”
SureGrip™ automates the process of picking up single joints of casing and stabbing them into the string, which reduces manual handling requirements – the number one cause of rig safety incidents. It utilizes the top drive to apply torque and simultaneously rotate, reciprocate and circulate, crucial for overcoming troublesome hole conditions and yielding better cement jobs, preventing the need for costly remedial actions. SureGrip extends the top drive’s capabilities downhole.
“When running casing, operators need to reduce costs by improving the efficiency and safety of landing casing,” said Papouras. ”Canrig’s SureGrip CRT delivers a process that is more cost effective, seamlessly integrates with your existing equipment and is less damaging to your casing. Running casing has never been more efficient or safer.”
The LOC-400 drilling rig, known as
DeleteCrusader 405, is the most advanced
deep gas drilling rig currently available
in Australia. Key features of Crusader
405 include:
• Small footprint – reducing site
preparation requirements;
• Highly mobile – modular and
containerised design improves
mobility and reduces intra and
inter basin transportation costs;
• Highly automated – automated rig
floor reduces manual handling
operations and improves crew health
and safety;
• Cyber drilling – cyber control
station in air conditioned control
room centralises all primary rig
functions and provides a
comfortable working environment;
• Enhanced reliability – high degree
of redundancy on power generation
and control functions enhances the
reliability and safety of the rig and
the well;
• Casing drilling – integrated casing
drilling capabilities enable a
step-change reduction in well
construction time and cost;
• Small crew – smaller rig crews
(including removal of some third
party well-site services) reduces
the number of personnel at site
thereby lowering overall well
construction costs.
These key features make Crusader
405 attractive to operators seeking
to conduct exploration and appraisal
programmes in the more remote
basins of Western Australia and the
Northern Territory.
.
Senior crew members will also
undertake comprehensive training on
a purpose-built LOC-400 simulator
located in Houston, Texas.
.
Crusader 405
is contracted to Buru Energy Limited
for an initial four well campaign in
the Canning Basin. This will involve
a 2600 kilometre journey to the
Canning Basin.
http://www.dmp.wa.gov.au/documents/Petroleum_WA_September_2013.pdf
THE STORY OF THE "RED QUEEN"
DeleteU.S. Shale-Oil Boom May Not Last as Fracking Wells Lack Staying Power
Chesapeake Energy’s (CHK) Serenity 1-3H well near Oklahoma City came in as a gusher in 2009, pumping more than 1,200 barrels of oil a day and kicking off a rush to drill that extended into Kansas. Now the well produces less than 100 barrels a day, state records show. Serenity’s swift decline sheds light on a dirty secret of the oil boom: It may not last. Shale wells start strong and fade fast, and producers are drilling at a breakneck pace to hold output steady. In the fields, this incessant need to drill is known as the Red Queen, after the character in Through the Looking-Glass who tells Alice, “It takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place.”
The U.S. is producing 7.8 million barrels of oil a day, more than it has in a quarter-century. Crude from shale formations has cut reliance on imports and put the U.S. closer to energy independence than it’s been since 1989. The International Energy Agency predicted last year that the U.S. would overtake Saudi Arabia by 2020 as the world’s largest producer.
Whether current production can hold up is the subject of debate. David Hughes, a geoscientist and president of Global Sustainability Research, has examined the life span of shale wells. “The Red Queen syndrome just gets worse and worse and worse,” he says. “The higher production goes, the more wells you need to offset the decline.”
.
Global Sustainability’s Hughes estimates the U.S. needs to drill 6,000 new wells per year at a cost of $35 billion to maintain current production. His research also shows that the newest wells aren’t as productive as those drilled in the first years of the boom, a sign that oil companies have already tapped the best spots, making it that much harder to keep breaking records. Hughes has predicted that production will peak in 2017 and fall to 2012 levels within two years.
“The hype about U.S. energy independence and ‘Saudi America’ is deafening if you look at the mainstream media,” Hughes says. “We need to have a much more in-depth and intelligent discussion about this.” On Oct. 7, Abdalla Salem el-Badri, OPEC’s secretary general, said at a conference in Kuwait that U.S. shale producers are “running out of sweet spots” and that output will peak in 2018.
..
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-10-10/u-dot-s-dot-shale-oil-boom-may-not-last-as-fracking-wells-lack-staying-power
THE "TOTALLY INSANE" REPORT.
ReplyDelete...
Tremendous Investment, Astute Project Management Needed for US Shale
Oil and gas companies will require significant investment and astute project management to successfully execute large capital projects in North America and worldwide at a time when skilled workers are increasingly in short supply, according to a recent report by the Deloitte Center for Energy Solutions.
Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing, along with advances in deepwater drilling technology and growing Canadian oil sands production, have unlocked previously inaccessible shale and deepwater resources and have bolstered North America onshore and offshore oil and gas production, Deloitte noted in “The Challenge of Renaissance: Managing an unprecedented wave of oil and gas investment”.
Thanks to this production growth, the United States could become the world’s largest oil producer by early 2020, with peak production of 11 million barrels of oil per day (MMbopd) overtaking Saudi Arabia’s projected production of 10.5 MMbopd, according to International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates.
Total U.S. natural gas production, including shale gas and tight oil, is expected to rise to 75 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) in 2020 from production in 2005 of 49 Bcf/d. However, this production target will require sustained levels of onshore unconventional well activity across many North America shale basins over the next 20 to 30 years.
According to IEA estimates, nearly $5 trillion in oil and gas investment will be needed in North America through 2035 to maintain current production and meet future demand growth.
*****
The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that over 630,000 new wells will be needed to bring available U.S. shale gas and tight oil resources into production.
*****
The number of wells substantially raises the capital requirements for resource development, and companies will need experienced project managers to efficiently bring these wells online. “One of the key challenges operators face to bring these wells online is their ability to acquire experienced project managers and skilled talent,” Deloitte said in the report.
“Once online, these wells will ultimately require recompletion, artificial lift, and eventually, enhanced recovery to keep them producing.”
The number of North America megaprojects with a capital investment value of $1 billion or greater also is expected to grow due to infrastructure development for deepwater, midstream and liquefied natural gas (LNG) export capacity, as well as expansion of U.S. petrochemical capacity and possible gas-to-liquids facilities.
.
Surge in Megaproject Poses Challenges for Oil, Gas Industry
The investment surge in North America reflects a growing trend worldwide of significant investment in oil and gas capital projects.
Worldwide, the oil and gas industry will invest up to $700 billion over the next two to four years in capital projects, said Alan Richard, director at Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP, at the Deloitte Oil & Gas Conference in Houston in November. North American megaprojects will have to compete for investment dollars with international oil and gas megaprojects for large, technically complex oil and gas deepwater and frontier resources. The size and unprecedented number of concurrent megaprojects present a significant challenge for the oil and gas industry.
Deloitte noted in the report that oil majors are undertaking this year three to five megaprojects at the same time, which account for 24 to 35 percent of their annual cash flows.
Many of these projects are valued at $1 billion or greater, and the size of the projects means companies are outspending their cash flows.
“Even some of the larger independents in 2013 are undertaking between two and four megaprojects concurrently, which account for between 12 and 115 percent of their annual cash flows,” Deloitte said.
The LOC-400 drilling rig, known as
DeleteCrusader 405, is the most advanced
deep gas drilling rig currently available
in Australia. Key features of Crusader
405 include:
• Small footprint – reducing site
preparation requirements;
• Highly mobile – modular and
containerised design improves
mobility and reduces intra and
inter basin transportation costs;
• Highly automated – automated rig
floor reduces manual handling
operations and improves crew health
and safety;
• Cyber drilling – cyber control
station in air conditioned control
room centralises all primary rig
functions and provides a
comfortable working environment;
• Enhanced reliability – high degree
of redundancy on power generation
and control functions enhances the
reliability and safety of the rig and
the well;
• Casing drilling – integrated casing
drilling capabilities enable a
step-change reduction in well
construction time and cost;
• Small crew – smaller rig crews
(including removal of some third
party well-site services) reduces
the number of personnel at site
thereby lowering overall well
construction costs.
These key features make Crusader
405 attractive to operators seeking
to conduct exploration and appraisal
programmes in the more remote
basins of Western Australia and the
Northern Territory.
.
Senior crew members will also
undertake comprehensive training on
a purpose-built LOC-400 simulator
located in Houston, Texas.
.
Crusader 405
is contracted to Buru Energy Limited
for an initial four well campaign in
the Canning Basin. This will involve
a 2600 kilometre journey to the
Canning Basin.
http://www.dmp.wa.gov.au/documents/Petroleum_WA_September_2013.pdf
Sorry - BlogSpot gone silly again
DeleteUS Chamber Proposes Energy Reforms to Reflect New Energy Revolution
ReplyDeleteThe U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Institute for 21st Century Energy revealed Wednesday its new Energy Works for U.S. platform, an update of its 2008 Blueprint for Securing America’s Energy Future, to reflect the current boom in unconventional oil and gas exploration in the United States
. The plan, which includes 64 specific recommendations in nine key areas, will form the basis for the U.S. Chamber’s energy advocacy across the United States this year and in the future.
These recommendations, which institute officials say will create millions of jobs and generate billions in revenue and trillions in private investment, and reduce U.S. public debt, include:
Removing barriers to increased oil and gas production and fuel manufacturing
Maintain coal’s role as a vital part of a diverse energy portfolio
Expand nuclear energy use and commit to a nuclear waste solution
Enhance the competitiveness of renewable sources of energy
Promote 21st century energy efficiency and advanced technologies
Modernize the permitting process for our nation’s energy infrastructure
Protect our energy infrastructure from physical disruptions and cyber attacks
Reform the regulatory process for balance, predictability and transparency
Ensure a competitive energy workforce
In its recommendations, the institute called for the Department of the Interior (DOI) to propose a new plan for the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) that would open the eastern Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic and Pacific oceans to leasing and exploration and make significantly more onshore federal lands available for energy development.
The U.S. Congress should also provide a 37.5 percent share of royalty revenues from all new production on the OCS to the states adjacent to development areas.
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) also should delay finalizing a proposed rule for hydraulic fracturing on federal lands until BLM works with state and industry officials to ensure a future rule addresses an existing regulatory gap, and not just to demonstrate its ability to regulate.
Additionally, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency should also end its efforts to regulate fracking by circumventing the rulemaking process and unlawfully issuing de facto regulations as guidance documents.
- See more at: http://www.rigzone.com/news
East coast demand to soar as oil giants hog gas for export projects
ReplyDeleteOIL giants Shell and PetroChina have refused to offer new domestic gas supply from their vast Queensland coal-seam gas reserves, warehousing all the gas for an LNG export project that is yet to be approved due to high Australian construction costs.
Amid concerns of a looming east coast gas shortage, it is understood the pair's Brisbane-based Arrow Energy joint venture has been approached by at least two domestic major east coast gas buyers but has been unwilling to take part in the tender process.
.........................................
BP Releases Energy Outlook 2035
........................The Outlook reveals that global energy consumption is expected to rise by 41 per cent from 2012 to 2035 – compared to 55 per cent over the last 23 years (52 per cent over the last twenty) and 30% over the last ten. Ninety five per cent of that growth in demand is expected to come from the emerging economies, while energy use in the advanced economies of North America, Europe and Asia as a group is expected to grow only very slowly – and begin to decline in the later years of the forecast period.
Shares of the major fossil fuels are converging with oil, natural gas and coal each expected to make up around 27% of the total mix by 2035 and the remaining share coming from nuclear, hydroelectricity and renewables. Among fossil fuels, gas is growing fastest, increasingly being used as a cleaner alternative to coal for power generation as well as in other sectors.
.
..................While the fuel mix is evolving, fossil fuels will continue to be dominant. Oil, gas and coal are expected to converge on market shares of around 26-27% each by 2035, and non-fossil fuels – nuclear, hydro and renewables – on a share of around 5-7% each.
Gas
Natural gas is expected to be the fastest growing of the fossil fuels – with demand rising at an average of 1.9% a year. Non-OECD countries are expected to generate 78% of demand growth. Industry and power generation account for the largest increments to demand by sector. LNG exports are expected to grow more than twice as fast as gas consumption, at an average of 3.9% per year, and accounting for 26% of the growth in global gas supply to 2035.
Shale gas supplies are expected to meet 46% of the growth in gas demand and account for 21% of world gas and 68% of US gas production by 2035. North American shale gas production growth is expected to slow after 2020 and production from other regions to increase, but in 2035 North America is still expected to account for 71% of world shale gas production.
.....................................
PIRA: Asian Near Term Spot Demand Climate Looking Bearish
PIRA Energy Group believes Asian near term spot demand climate is looking bearish. In the U.S., EIA changes its methodology for assessing associated gas production. In Europe, the peak period is upon us for seasonal gas demand over the next four weeks in a normal weather environment.
Specifically, PIRA’s analysis of natural gas market fundamentals has revealed the following:
Asian Near Term Spot Demand Climate Looking Bearish
In Asia, near term spot demand is looking much more bearish over the balance of 1Q14 and beyond owing to the nascent return to normal operation of Korea’s 23 scandal-plagued nuclear power units. PIRA forecasts a 9-mmcm/d year-on-year average drop in gas demand for power generation through June. This is the equivalent of some 3 standard cargos per month, and the forecasted decrease is on the conservative side.
Alaska Inks MoU with Largest Financier of LNG Projects
ReplyDeleteAlaska ‘s Natural Resources Commissioner Dan Sullivan traveled to Japan this week to sign an agreement with one of the world’s largest financiers of LNG projects, speak at a global LNG conference, and engage in bilateral meetings with business and government officials.
“The goal of this trip was to build upon the extensive engagement that the Parnell Administration has undertaken in the past few years to develop strong relationships with the world’s leading LNG buyers, their governments, and consumers,” Sullivan said.
A key element of the trip was the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Department of Natural Resources and the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC). JBIC is a financial institution that plays a critical role in financing and securing Japan’s LNG imports. Sullivan and JBIC Managing Director Koichi Yajima signed the MOU in Tokyo.
..................................
Dominion Appoints Two Officers to Cove Point LNG Team
Dominion has named two officers to its Cove Point LNG Terminal team as it awaits necessary federal and state permits to begin construction of a facility to liquefy natural gas for export.
....................................
FERC Releases Cameron LNG DEIS
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has prepared a draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for the Cameron liquefaction project proposed by Cameron LNG and Cameron Interstate Pipeline.
Cameron is requesting authorization to export 12 million tons of LNG per year from its terminal in Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, Louisiana.
The draft EIS assesses the potential environmental effects of the construction and operation of the Cameron Liquefaction Project in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
“The FERC staff concludes that approval of the proposed Project, with the mitigation measures recommended in the EIS, would ensure that impacts in the Project area would be avoided or minimized and would not be significant,” FERC said in a statement.
Mozambique Minister Optimistic about Early LNG Deals with India
ReplyDeleteIn a meeting between Indian petroleum Minister, Veerappa Moily, and his Mozambique counterpart, Esperanca Bias, during Petrotech 2014, the Mozambique Minister for Mineral Resources showed optimism that the deals relating the LNG project will fructify soon, and the first LNG trains may start moving by 2019.
This was one of the 11 bilateral meetings lined up during the Petrotech-2014, organized by ONGC.
In the context of Indian companies ONGC Videsh Limited (OVL), OIL and BPCL having committed significant investments in this Mozambique LNG project, Moliy urged the Mozambique minister to expedite the consortium related issues and also fast-track the development of the discovered assets. The Indian companies hold 30 per cent of the project costing around 60 billion US dollars, the operatorship of which lies with Anadarco.
.
India has finalized a demand of up to 8 trains of LNG, starting with 4 trains. The pricing aspects were also discussed between the Ministers during the bilateral meeting, which was represented by ONGC CMD, OVL MD and other corporate honchos.
................................
VINCI Scores Contract for Yamal LNG Storage Tanks
Entrepose Contracting and VINCI Construction Grands Projets, both subsidiaries of VINCI, have been awarded a contract with JSC Yamal LNG, owned by NOVATEK (80 %) and TOTAL (20 %), to perform an engineering, procurement, supply, construction and commissioning of four cryogenic full-containment LNG storage tanks.
Each LNG tank will be composed of a 9% nickel stainless steel interior container and a pre-stressed concrete external container, with a capacity of 160,000 cubic meters each.
These tanks will form part of a 16.5 million tons per annum natural gas liquefaction project, which will utilise the resources of the South Tambey Gas Condensate Field situated in the Yamal Peninsula in the Russian Federation.
.......................................
Novatek Sells 20 Pct Share in Yamal LNG to CNODC
.................................
Fluor, JGC Secure EPC Contract for Kitimat LNG
Fluor Corporation announced that its joint venture with JGC was awarded an engineering, procurement and construction contract by Chevron Canada for the proposed Kitimat LNG project in Bish Cove, British Columbia, Canada.
Chevron and Apache Canada each hold a 50 percent interest in the proposed project.
...................................
Nice post. It is very informative post. I enjoy reading you post. It is helpful for everyone. Thanks for sharing this post with us.
ReplyDeleteliquid lubricants
This is important, though it's necessary to help you head over to it weblink: short setting tools
ReplyDeleteWe Are Providing OTS Jobs 2020
ReplyDeleteEspecially OTS Jobs 2020
Follow Me For Daily Update
OTS Jobs 2020
This is such a beneficial post for Broome Diesel and Hydraulic Service services. If you are looking the same then must read this blog.
ReplyDelete